These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9494438)

  • 21. Organizational justice and health; review of evidence.
    Elovainio M; Heponiemi T; Sinervo T; Magnavita N
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2010; 32(3 Suppl B):B5-9. PubMed ID: 21299075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Just rewards: 17-Month-old infants expect agents to take resources according to the principles of distributive justice.
    Wang Y; Henderson AME
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Aug; 172():25-40. PubMed ID: 29574235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Promoting employee wellbeing: the relevance of work characteristics and organizational justice.
    Lawson KJ; Noblet AJ; Rodwell JJ
    Health Promot Int; 2009 Sep; 24(3):223-33. PubMed ID: 19596657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tools for fairness: Increased structure in the selection process reduces discrimination.
    Wolgast S; Bäckström M; Björklund F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189512. PubMed ID: 29228052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robots are judging me: Perceived fairness of algorithmic recruitment tools.
    Hilliard A; Guenole N; Leutner F
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():940456. PubMed ID: 35959005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Relationship between Just World Beliefs and Life Satisfaction.
    Harding WG; McConatha JT; Kumar VK
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(17):. PubMed ID: 32899134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Trust in decision-making authorities dictates the form of the interactive relationship between outcome fairness and procedural fairness.
    Bianchi EC; Brockner J; van den Bos K; Seifert M; Moon H; van Dijke M; De Cremer D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Jan; 41(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 25387762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of role and gender on the use of distributive versus procedural justice principles.
    Tata J
    J Psychol; 2000 May; 134(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 10907704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Experiences of the fairness of recruitment from unsuccessful applicants in the field of nursing.
    Kanerva A; Lammintakanen J; Kivinen T
    J Nurs Manag; 2010 Apr; 18(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 20546469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Distributive and procedural justice in seven nations.
    Cohn ES; White SO; Sanders J
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Oct; 24(5):553-79. PubMed ID: 11026211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Decision frame and procedural justice: interactive effects on perceptions of distributive justice.
    Flint DH; Cole ND
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Oct; 93(2):631-7. PubMed ID: 14650697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dialectical thinking and fairness-based perspectives of affirmative action.
    Hideg I; Ferris DL
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 May; 102(5):782-801. PubMed ID: 28150989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cognitive bias in procedural justice: formation and implications of illusory correlations in perceived intergroup fairness.
    Stroessner SJ; Heuer LB
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1996 Oct; 71(4):717-28. PubMed ID: 8888600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Gender, justice and work: a distributive approach to perceptions of housework fairness.
    Perales F; Baxter J; Tai TO
    Soc Sci Res; 2015 May; 51():51-63. PubMed ID: 25769851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Employee conscientiousness, agreeableness, and supervisor justice rule compliance: A three-study investigation.
    Huang JL; Cropanzano R; Li A; Shao P; Zhang XA; Li Y
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 Nov; 102(11):1564-1589. PubMed ID: 28749156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of societal benefits and fairness concerns among decision makers and decision recipients.
    Heuer L; Penrod S; Kattan A
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Dec; 31(6):573-610. PubMed ID: 17245632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Longitudinal Relationships Between Organizational Justice, Productivity Loss, and Sickness Absence Among Older Employees.
    Ybema JF; van der Meer L; Leijten FR
    Int J Behav Med; 2016 Oct; 23(5):645-54. PubMed ID: 26915029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Procedural justice and status: status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects.
    van Prooijen JW; van den Bos K; Wilke HA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Dec; 83(6):1353-61. PubMed ID: 12500817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The construction of feelings of justice in environmental management: An empirical study of multiple biodiversity conflicts in Calakmul, Mexico.
    Lecuyer L; White RM; Schmook B; Lemay V; Calmé S
    J Environ Manage; 2018 May; 213():363-373. PubMed ID: 29502021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Justice and Negotiation.
    Druckman D; Wagner LM
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2016; 67():387-413. PubMed ID: 26273898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.