73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9494510)
1. Unusual artifact with mammography film.
Hedrick WR; Poulton TB; Starchman DE; Tobias TE
Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):835-7. PubMed ID: 9494510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Motion artifact seen on slot-scanning direct digital mammography.
Boyle ER; Pak D; Williams JB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Mar; 172(3):697-701. PubMed ID: 10063863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality control in mammography.
Hendrick RE; Botsco M; Plott CM
Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1041-57. PubMed ID: 7480654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography with synchrotron radiation: phase-detection techniques.
Arfelli F; Bonvicini V; Bravin A; Cantatore G; Castelli E; Palma LD; Michiel MD; Fabrizioli M; Longo R; Menk RH; Olivo A; Pani S; Pontoni D; Poropat P; Prest M; Rashevsky A; Ratti M; Rigon L; Tromba G; Vacchi A; Vallazza E; Zanconati F
Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):286-93. PubMed ID: 10751500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimizing optical density of a Kodak mammography film-screen combination with standard-cycle processing.
McParland BJ; Boyd MM; al Yousef K
Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):950-3. PubMed ID: 10195010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short communication: a comparison of fine and medium screens for mammography.
Burch A; Law J
Br J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 69(818):182-5. PubMed ID: 8785649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiographic techniques in screen-film mammography.
LaVoy TR; Huda W; Ogden KM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 12132948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimum processing of mammographic film.
Sprawls P; Kitts EL
Radiographics; 1996 Mar; 16(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 8966292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital mammography system problem.
Peart O
Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(6):569-70. PubMed ID: 21771940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammography dosimetry using an in-house developed polymethyl methacrylate phantom.
Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS; Chourasiya G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 22232773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An unexpected artefact with low-contrast high-energy film.
Cowley I; Thomas S
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(1):N17-21. PubMed ID: 16357425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modification of an automatic exposure control system for mammography to accommodate multiple-speed, screen-film systems.
Rossi RP; Williams C; Gill D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):685-6. PubMed ID: 3262269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammographic artifact due to film.
Margolies L
Radiology; 1998 Aug; 208(2):552-3. PubMed ID: 9680594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of image quality on 28 mammography X-ray sets in the UK.
Law J
Br J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 70(839):1131-8. PubMed ID: 9536904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of two mammography film-screen combinations designed for standard-cycle processing.
McParland BJ
Br J Radiol; 1999 Jan; 72(853):73-5. PubMed ID: 10341692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Further comparisons of films, screens and cassettes for mammography.
Law J; Kirkpatrick AE
Br J Radiol; 1990 Feb; 63(746):128-31. PubMed ID: 2310905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detecting film-screen artifacts in mammography using a model-based approach.
Highnam R; Brady M; English R
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Oct; 18(10):1016-24. PubMed ID: 10628960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammography screen-film selection: individual facility testing technique.
Kimme-Smith C; Bassett L; Gold RH; Parkinson B
Med Phys; 1992; 19(5):1195-9. PubMed ID: 1435598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
