These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9495128)

  • 1. An in-vitro SEM comparative study of debridement ability of K-Files and Canal Master.
    Valli KS; Lata DA; Jagdish S
    Indian J Dent Res; 1996; 7(4):128-34. PubMed ID: 9495128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of the minimum instrumentation size for penetration of irrigants to the apical third of root canal systems.
    Khademi A; Yazdizadeh M; Feizianfard M
    J Endod; 2006 May; 32(5):417-20. PubMed ID: 16631839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
    Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals.
    Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E
    Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of different surface treatments on the push-out bond strength of fiber post to root canal dentin.
    Demiryürek EO; Külünk S; Saraç D; Yüksel G; Bulucu B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):e74-80. PubMed ID: 19615650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of Er:YAG laser irradiation in removing debris and smear layer on root canal walls.
    Takeda FH; Harashima T; Kimura Y; Matsumoto K
    J Endod; 1998 Aug; 24(8):548-51. PubMed ID: 9759018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
    Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation.
    Hülsmann M; Rümmelin C; Schäfers F
    J Endod; 1997 May; 23(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 9545932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of Er,Cr:YSGG laser therapy on the cleanliness of the root canal walls of primary teeth.
    Soares F; Varella CH; Pileggi R; Adewumi A; Guelmann M
    J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):474-7. PubMed ID: 18358901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
    Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT
    Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An ex vivo evaluation of a new root canal irrigation technique with intracanal aspiration.
    Fukumoto Y; Kikuchi I; Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H
    Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 16454788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the smear layer removal effectiveness of EDTA using two techniques: an SEM study.
    Tinaz AC; Karadag LS; Alaçam T; Mihçioglu T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Feb; 7(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 16491143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of Nd:YAG lasers on root canal walls: a light and scanning electron microscopic study.
    Barbakow F; Peters O; Havranek L
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Dec; 30(12):837-45. PubMed ID: 10765861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jul; 39(7):521-6. PubMed ID: 16776756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.