These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9495615)

  • 1. The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro.
    Flemmig TF; Petersilka GJ; Mehl A; Hickel R; Klaiber B
    J Clin Periodontol; 1998 Feb; 25(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 9495615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Working parameters of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro.
    Flemmig TF; Petersilka GJ; Mehl A; Hickel R; Klaiber B
    J Periodontol; 1998 May; 69(5):547-53. PubMed ID: 9623897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Working parameters of a sonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro.
    Flemmig TF; Petersilka GJ; Mehl A; Rüdiger S; Hickel R; Klaiber B
    Clin Oral Investig; 1997 Jun; 1(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 9552818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Significant influence of scaler tip design on root substance loss resulting from ultrasonic scaling: a laserprofilometric in vitro study.
    Jepsen S; Ayna M; Hedderich J; Eberhard J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Nov; 31(11):1003-6. PubMed ID: 15491317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Root surface defect produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scaler with different power settings: an in vitro study.
    Casarin RC; Ribeiro FV; Sallum AW; Sallum EA; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
    Braz Dent J; 2009; 20(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 19466233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety and efficiency of novel sonic scaler tips in vitro.
    Petersilka GJ; Draenert M; Mehl A; Hickel R; Flemmig TF
    J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Jun; 30(6):551-5. PubMed ID: 12795794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of tip wear of piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers on root surface roughness at different working parameters. A profilometric and atomic force microscopy study.
    Arabaci T; Cicek Y; Dilsiz A; Erdogan İY; Kose O; Kizildağ A
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2013 Feb; 11(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 23033943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effect of Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Scaler Tip Wear on Root Surface Roughness at Different Working Parameters: An Atomic Force Microscopic and Profilometric Study.
    Vengatachalapathi H; Naik R; Rao R; Venugopal R; Nichani AS
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2017 Jan; 19(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 31473708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo.
    Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K
    J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument.
    Busslinger A; Lampe K; Beuchat M; Lehmann B
    J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 28(7):642-9. PubMed ID: 11422585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasonic scaler oscillations and tooth-surface defects.
    Lea SC; Felver B; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Dent Res; 2009 Mar; 88(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 19329455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of parameters on root surface roughness following treatment with a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler: an in vitro study.
    Folwaczny M; Merkel U; Mehl A; Hickel R
    J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1221-6. PubMed ID: 15515337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface alterations of several dental materials by a novel ultrasonic scaler tip.
    Seol HW; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Baek SH; Lee SY
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(4):801-10. PubMed ID: 22848881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of scaler tip design on root surface roughness, tooth substance loss and patients' pain perception: an in vitro and a randomised clinical trial.
    Abdul Hayei NA; Yahya NA; Safii SH; Saub R; Vaithilingam RD; Baharuddin NA
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Mar; 21(1):169. PubMed ID: 33789646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of the angle of instrumentation of the Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Scaler on root surfaces.
    Oliveira G; Macedo PD; Tsurumaki JN; Sampaio JE; Marcantonio R
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2016 Aug; 14(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 25690687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Root surface texture after different scaling modalities.
    Jacobson L; Blomlöf J; Lindskog S
    Scand J Dent Res; 1994 Jun; 102(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 8085122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasonic scaler tip performance under various load conditions.
    Lea SC; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Oct; 30(10):876-81. PubMed ID: 14629574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cleaning ability and induced dentin loss of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic instrument at different power settings.
    Lampe Bless K; Sener B; Dual J; Attin T; Schmidlin PR
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Apr; 15(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 20127378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the safety and efficiency of novel metallic ultrasonic scaler tip on titanium surfaces.
    Baek SH; Shon WJ; Bae KS; Kum KY; Lee WC; Park YS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1269-74. PubMed ID: 22093039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of wear on ultrasonic scaler tip displacement amplitude.
    Lea SC; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 33(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 16367854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.