These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9496162)

  • 1. The quality of operation notes: can simple word processors help?
    O'Bichere A; Sellu D
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1997 Sep; 79(5 Suppl):204-8; discussion 209. PubMed ID: 9496162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An audit of the quality of operation notes in two district general hospitals. Are we following Royal College guidelines?
    Baigrie RJ; Dowling BL; Birch D; Dehn TC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1994 Jan; 76(1 Suppl):8-10. PubMed ID: 8017801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer generated operation notes.
    Currall VA; Chesser TJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 137():51-5. PubMed ID: 18560067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Setting the records straight--a prospective audit of the quality of case notes in a surgical department.
    Chamisa I; Zulu BM
    S Afr J Surg; 2007 Aug; 45(3):92, 94-5. PubMed ID: 17892187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of an aide-memoire to improve the quality of operation notes in an orthopaedic unit.
    Din R; Jena D; Muddu BN
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2001 Sep; 83(5):319-20. PubMed ID: 11806555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of the CRABEL Score for improving surgical case-note quality.
    Ho MY; Anderson AR; Nijjar A; Thomas C; Goenka A; Hossain J; Curley PJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Nov; 87(6):454-7. PubMed ID: 16263017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Basingstoke Orthopaedic Database: a high quality accurate information system for audit.
    Barlow IW; Flynn NA; Britton JM
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1994 Nov; 76(6 Suppl):285-7. PubMed ID: 7598401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An audit of the quality of operation notes in an otolaryngology unit.
    Bateman ND; Carney AS; Gibbin KP
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1999 Apr; 44(2):94-5. PubMed ID: 10230203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of clinical case note entries: how good are we at achieving set standards?
    Osborn GD; Pike H; Smith M; Winter R; Vaughan-Williams E
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Nov; 87(6):458-60. PubMed ID: 16263018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Basic computing for dental practitioners: 3. Word processors.
    Weerakone S; Turner PJ
    Dent Update; 1998; 25(6):241-6. PubMed ID: 9852825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A method for auditing medical records quality: audit of 467 medical records within the framework of the medical information systems project quality control].
    Boulay F; Chevallier T; Gendreike Y; Mailland V; Joliot Y; Sambuc R
    Sante Publique; 1998 Mar; 10(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 9685806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Colorectal cancer audit: a comparative study before and after establishing a specialty colorectal surgery unit.
    Sitzler PJ; Taylor M; Faragher I; McLaughlin S
    Colorectal Dis; 2005 May; 7(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 15859966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of database management system by surgeons to produce operation notes.
    Dale RF; Midwinter MJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1996 Nov; 78(6 Suppl):272-5. PubMed ID: 8944499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AAMT (American Association for Medical Transcription) speaks out on confidentiality, privacy, and patient care documentation.
    J Am Assoc Med Transcr; 1995; 14(4):42, 44-7. PubMed ID: 10143813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of clinical notes for vascular surgery admissions: a CRABEL score review.
    Suh J; Roake JA; Lewis DR
    ANZ J Surg; 2009 Jul; 79(7-8):539-43. PubMed ID: 19694664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electronic templates versus dictation for the completion of Mohs micrographic surgery operative notes.
    Cowan DA; Sands MB; Rabizadeh SM; Amos CS; Ford C; Nussbaum R; Stein D; Liegeois NJ
    Dermatol Surg; 2007 May; 33(5):588-95. PubMed ID: 17451582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The quality of operative note taking: an audit using the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines as the gold standard.
    Shayah A; Agada FO; Gunasekaran S; Jassar P; England RJ
    Int J Clin Pract; 2007 Apr; 61(4):677-9. PubMed ID: 17394439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An audit of operative notes: facts and ways to improve.
    Lefter LP; Walker SR; Dewhurst F; Turner RW
    ANZ J Surg; 2008 Sep; 78(9):800-2. PubMed ID: 18844913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Quality of data on computerized registration of postoperative wound infections].
    Bentsen HH; Jensen LP; Håkansson TU
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1995 May; 157(19):2717-9. PubMed ID: 7770971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The quality of record keeping in primary care: a comparison of computerised, paper and hybrid systems.
    Hamilton WT; Round AP; Sharp D; Peters TJ
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Dec; 53(497):929-33; discussion 933. PubMed ID: 14960216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.