175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9497647)
1. Effectiveness of two rotary instrumentation techniques for cleaning the root canal.
Kataia MA; Ezzat KM; el-Sayed JM; Seif RE
Egypt Dent J; 1995 Apr; 41(2):1113-9. PubMed ID: 9497647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of the EndoActivator System in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation.
Uroz-Torres D; González-Rodríguez MP; Ferrer-Luque CM
J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):308-11. PubMed ID: 20113797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effectiveness of different acid irrigating solutions in root canal cleaning after hand and rotary instrumentation.
Pérez-Heredia M; Ferrer-Luque CM; González-Rodríguez MP
J Endod; 2006 Oct; 32(10):993-7. PubMed ID: 16982281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microbial status of apical root canal system of human mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after "one-visit" endodontic treatment.
Nair PN; Henry S; Cano V; Vera J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Feb; 99(2):231-52. PubMed ID: 15660098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shaping and cleaning the root canal system: a scanning electron microscopic evaluation of a new instrumentation and irrigation technique.
Gambarini G
J Endod; 1999 Dec; 25(12):800-3. PubMed ID: 10726524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hard-tissue debris accumulation created by conventional rotary versus self-adjusting file instrumentation in mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars.
Paqué F; Al-Jadaa A; Kfir A
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 22188277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SEM analysis of smear layer removal after manual and automated handpiece root canal preparation.
Sydney GB; Batista A; Estrela C; Pesce HF; de Melo LL
Braz Dent J; 1996; 7(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 9206350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effectiveness of increased apical enlargement in reducing intracanal bacteria.
Card SJ; Sigurdsson A; Orstavik D; Trope M
J Endod; 2002 Nov; 28(11):779-83. PubMed ID: 12470024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of irrigation on debris and smear layer on canal walls prepared by two rotary techniques: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Peters OA; Barbakow F
J Endod; 2000 Jan; 26(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 11194369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals.
Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E
Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.
Al-Ali M; Sathorn C; Parashos P
Int Endod J; 2012 Oct; 45(10):898-906. PubMed ID: 22486845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution and gel for smear layer removal.
Dotto SR; Travassos RM; de Oliveira EP; Machado ME; Martins JL
Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):62-5. PubMed ID: 17697246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Glyde File Prep in combination with sodium hypochlorite as a root canal irrigant.
Grandini S; Balleri P; Ferrari M
J Endod; 2002 Apr; 28(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 12043868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro comparisons of debris removal of the EndoActivator system, the F file, ultrasonic irrigation, and NaOCl irrigation alone after hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars.
Klyn SL; Kirkpatrick TC; Rutledge RE
J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1367-71. PubMed ID: 20647098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer.
Torabinejad M; Khademi AA; Babagoli J; Cho Y; Johnson WB; Bozhilov K; Kim J; Shabahang S
J Endod; 2003 Mar; 29(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12669874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of instrumentation with two different file types, each with 2.5% NaOCl irrigation on the microhardness of root dentin.
Slutzky-Goldberg I; Liberman R; Heling I
J Endod; 2002 Apr; 28(4):311-2. PubMed ID: 12043870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cleanliness of the root canal walls after preparation with Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments: a SEM study].
Lichota D; Nowicka A; Woźniak K; Lipski M
Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(3):58-62. PubMed ID: 19839513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
