137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9497709)
1. The use of the Periotest value as the initial success criteria of an implant: 8-year report.
Aparicio C
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Apr; 17(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 9497709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Periotest method as a measure of osseointegrated oral implant stability.
Olivé J; Aparicio C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(4):390-400. PubMed ID: 2094658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mobility assessment with the Periotest system in relation to histologic findings of oral implants.
Isidor F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 9638008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between contact time measurements and PTV values when using the Periotest to measure implant stability.
Meredith N; Friberg B; Sennerby L; Aparicio C
Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 9728122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Periotest: an objective clinical diagnosis of bone apposition toward implants.
Teerlinck J; Quirynen M; Darius P; van Steenberghe D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 1843494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant.
Meredith N
Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(5):491-501. PubMed ID: 9922740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use and abuse of the Periotest for 2-piece implant/abutment systems.
Faulkner MG; Giannitsios D; Lipsett AW; Wolfaardt JF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 11515995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical state assessment of the implant-bone continuum: a better understanding of the Periotest method.
Tricio J; Laohapand P; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M; Naert I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 7615316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of occlusal wear on bone loss and Periotest value of dental implants.
Engel E; Gomez-Roman G; Axmann-Krcmar D
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 12066640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term evaluation of submerged and nonsubmerged ITI solid-screw titanium implants: a 10-year life table analysis of 468 implants.
Lambrecht JT; Filippi A; Künzel AR; Schiel HJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):826-34. PubMed ID: 14696658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of implant mobility at second-stage surgery with the Periotest: DICRG Interim Report No. 3. Dental Implant Clinical Research Group.
Truhlar RS; Morris HF; Ochi S; Winkler S
Implant Dent; 1994; 3(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 7749399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of the implant abutment on the Periotest value: an in vivo study.
Gomez-Roman G; Lukas D
Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(10):797-9. PubMed ID: 11820048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective study to assess osseointegration of dental endosseous implants with the Periotest instrument.
Drago CJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 10874804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the implant master cast by means of the Periotest method.
May KB; Curtis A; Wang RF
Implant Dent; 1999; 8(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 10635155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring abutment/implant joint integrity with the Periotest instrument.
Faulkner MG; Wolfaardt JF; Chan A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(5):681-8. PubMed ID: 10531740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of early exposure on the integration of dental implants: Part 2--Clinical findings at 6 months postloading.
Holt R; Vernino AR; Lee HM; Severson S
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Aug; 21(4):407-14. PubMed ID: 11519709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement of dental implant stability by resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment: comparison of both techniques in a clinical trial.
Zix J; Hug S; Kessler-Liechti G; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):525-30. PubMed ID: 18700378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative clinical investigation of 2 early loaded ITI dental implants supporting an overdenture in the mandible.
Røynesdal AK; Amundrud B; Hannaes HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 11324212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evaluation of the Periotest system. Part I: Examiner reliability and repeatability of readings. Dental Implant Clinical Group (Planning Committee).
Manz MC; Morris HF; Ochi S
Implant Dent; 1992; 1(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 1288806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
