These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9497709)

  • 21. A comparative study of two noninvasive techniques to evaluate implant stability: Periotest and Osstell Mentor.
    Oh JS; Kim SG; Lim SC; Ong JL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 19095473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bone density: its influence on implant stability after uncovering.
    Morris HE; Ochi S; Crum P; Orenstein I; Plezia R
    J Oral Implantol; 2003; 29(6):263-9. PubMed ID: 14719574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part I: an in vitro study on measurement reliability and a method of comparison in the determination of primary dental implant stability.
    Lachmann S; Jäger B; Axmann D; Gomez-Roman G; Groten M; Weber H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 16441787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Osseointegrated implant failures.
    O'Mahony A; Spencer P
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 1999; 45(2):44-51. PubMed ID: 10686922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of Periotest values of integrated implants with and without healing abutments: a pilot study.
    Barber HD; Seckinger RJ; Phillips K; Saunders DR; Forshey J; Drummond T; Mante F
    Implant Dent; 1996; 5(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 9081586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Testing progressive loading of endosteal implants with the Periotest: a pilot study.
    Rotter BE; Blackwell R; Dalton G
    Implant Dent; 1996; 5(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 9151614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A study of the bone healing kinetics of plateau versus screw root design titanium dental implants.
    Leonard G; Coelho P; Polyzois I; Stassen L; Claffey N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 19397634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparative clinical study of three different endosseous implants in edentulous mandibles.
    Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Støvne S; Haanaes HR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 9714956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Impact of local and systemic factors on the incidence of oral implant failures, up to abutment connection.
    Alsaadi G; Quirynen M; Komárek A; van Steenberghe D
    J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Jul; 34(7):610-7. PubMed ID: 17433044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ten-year experience in oral implant rehabilitation of cancer patients: treatment concept and proposed criteria for success.
    Weischer T; Mohr C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):521-8. PubMed ID: 10453667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Immediate loading of modular transitional implants: a histologic and histomorphometric study in dogs.
    Zubery Y; Bichacho N; Moses O; Tal H
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1999 Aug; 19(4):343-53. PubMed ID: 10709501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The use of the Periotest method for the clinical assessment of the efficacy of dental implantation].
    Matveeva AI; Gvetadze RSh; Loginov VE
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1999; 78(3):28-9. PubMed ID: 10368602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of early exposure on the integration of dental implants in the baboon: Part 1--Clinical findings at uncovering.
    Severson S; Vernino AR; Caudill R; Holt R; Church C; Davis A
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Apr; 20(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 11203558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of implant type, material, coating, diameter, and length on periotest values at second-stage surgery: DICRG interim report no. 4. Dental Implant Clinical Research Group.
    Ochi S; Morris HF; Winkler S
    Implant Dent; 1994; 3(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 7749400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Syncrystallization: a technique for temporization of immediately loaded implants with metal-reinforced acrylic resin restorations.
    Degidi M; Gehrke P; Spanel A; Piattelli A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):123-34. PubMed ID: 16919020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of implant geometry and surface characteristics on progressive osseointegration.
    Geurs NC; Jeffcoat RL; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 12507240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of osteoporotic status on the survival of titanium dental implants.
    Holahan CM; Koka S; Kennel KA; Weaver AL; Assad DA; Regennitter FJ; Kademani D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):905-10. PubMed ID: 19014161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: four-year interim report.
    Testori T; Wiseman L; Woolfe S; Porter SS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 11324207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Six-month performance of implants with oxidized and machined surfaces restored at 2, 4, and 6 weeks postimplantation in adult beagle dogs.
    Knobloch L; Larsen PA; Rashid B; Carr AB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 15214218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Implant-supported fixed partial prostheses: a retrospective study.
    Johansson LA; Ekfeldt A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 12737250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.