These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9497709)

  • 41. Analysis of incidence and associated factors with fractured implants: a retrospective study.
    Eckert SE; Meraw SJ; Cal E; Ow RK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):662-7. PubMed ID: 11055133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Required minimum primary stability and torque values for immediate loading of mini dental implants: an experimental study in nonviable bovine femoral bone.
    Dilek O; Tezulas E; Dincel M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):e20-7. PubMed ID: 18230373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Early implant failures in patients treated with Brånemark System titanium dental implants: a retrospective study.
    Kronström M; Svenson B; Hellman M; Persson GR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 11324208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A short-term study on immediate functional loading and immediate nonfunctional loading implant in dogs: histomorphometric evaluation of bone reaction.
    Lee JY; Kim SG; Moon SY; Lim SC; Ong JL; Lee KM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 18996029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Single tooth replacement by Morse taper connection implants: a retrospective study of 80 implants.
    Mangano C; Bartolucci EG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):675-80. PubMed ID: 11669250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Success and failure rates of osseointegrated implants in function in regenerated bone for 72 to 133 months.
    Fugazzotto PA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 15747677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients.
    Bornstein MM; Chappuis V; von Arx T; Buser D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1034-43. PubMed ID: 18828820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Early implant failure. Prognostic capacity of Periotest: retrospective study of a large sample.
    Noguerol B; Muñoz R; Mesa F; de Dios Luna J; O'Valle F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Aug; 17(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 16907779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Damping characteristics of bone-to-implant interfaces. A clinical study with the Periotest device.
    van Steenberghe D; Tricio J; Naert I; Nys M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1995 Mar; 6(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 7669865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Periotest method for determining implant success.
    Van Scotter DE; Wilson CJ
    J Oral Implantol; 1991; 17(4):410-3. PubMed ID: 1813649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Resonance frequency analysis: measuring implant stability and osseointegration.
    Sennerby L; Meredith N
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1998 May; 19(5):493-8, 500, 502; quiz 504. PubMed ID: 9693511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The relationship of some histologic parameters, radiographic evaluations, and Periotest measurements of oral implants: an experimental animal study.
    Caulier H; Naert I; Kalk W; Jansen JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):380-6. PubMed ID: 9197104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of the Periotest as a diagnostic tool for dental implants.
    Cranin AN; DeGrado J; Kaufman M; Baraoidan M; DiGregorio R; Batgitis G; Lee Z
    J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 9893520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of early loaded free-standing dental implants with various coatings in beagle dogs.
    Corso M; Sirota C; Fiorellini J; Rasool F; Szmukler-Moncler S; Weber HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Oct; 82(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 10512961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Examination of the damping behavior of IMZ implants.
    Haas R; Saba M; Mensdorff-Pouilly N; Mailath G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(4):410-4. PubMed ID: 7672841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Compliant Keeper system replication of the periodontal ligament protective damping function for implants: Part I.
    Mensor MC; Ahlstrom RH; Scheerer EW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Nov; 80(5):565-9. PubMed ID: 9813807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Periotest values of dental implants in the first 2 years after second-stage surgery: DICRG interim report no. 8. Dental Implant Clinical Research Group.
    Walker L; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Implant Dent; 1997; 6(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 9477785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparative study of flexible (Polyactive) versus rigid (hydroxylapatite) permucosal dental implants. I. Clinical aspects.
    Meijer GJ; Cune MS; van Dooren M; de Putter C; van Blitterswijk CA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Feb; 24(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 9061617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Assessment of oral implant mobility.
    Chavez H; Ortman LF; DeFranco RL; Medige J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Nov; 70(5):421-6. PubMed ID: 8254544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Determination of Immediate-loaded Single Implants' Stability with Periotest.
    Jagadeesh KN; Kumar S; Parihar AS; Kaur J; Kumar R; Kumar K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1245-1248. PubMed ID: 33850070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.