164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9497718)
1. A comparison of two techniques for obtaining a connective tissue graft from the palate.
Harris RJ
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Jun; 17(3):260-71. PubMed ID: 9497718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A single-incision technique to harvest subepithelial connective tissue grafts from the palate.
Hürzeler MB; Weng D
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1999 Jun; 19(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 10635174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Connective tissue grafts combined with either double pedicle grafts or coronally positioned pedicle grafts: results of 266 consecutively treated defects in 200 patients.
Harris RJ
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Oct; 22(5):463-71. PubMed ID: 12449306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft.
Gunay H; Dogan S; Geurtsen W
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 18991001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recession.
Dembowska E; Drozdzik A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Sep; 104(3):e1-7. PubMed ID: 17618142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of multiple areas of gingival recession using a simple harvesting technique for autogenous connective tissue graft.
McLeod DE; Reyes E; Branch-Mays G
J Periodontol; 2009 Oct; 80(10):1680-7. PubMed ID: 19792859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of root coverage obtained with an acellular dermal matrix versus a connective tissue graft: results of 107 recession defects in 50 consecutively treated patients.
Harris RJ
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Feb; 20(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 11203548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An alternative technique to the harvesting of a connective tissue graft from a thin palate: enhanced wound healing.
Bosco AF; Bosco JM
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Apr; 27(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 17514885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Failure of root coverage of shallow gingival recessions employing GTR and a bioresorbable membrane.
Müller HP; Stahl M; Eger T
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Apr; 21(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 11829391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment of adjacent gingival recessions with subepithelial connective tissue grafts and the modified tunnel technique.
Tözüm TF; Dini FM
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 12674352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The subpedicle connective tissue graft. A bilaminar reconstructive procedure for the coverage of denuded root surfaces.
Nelson SW
J Periodontol; 1987 Feb; 58(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 3546673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of three techniques to obtain root coverage on mandibular incisors.
Harris RJ; Miller LH; Harris CR; Miller RJ
J Periodontol; 2005 Oct; 76(10):1758-67. PubMed ID: 16253099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions with the tunnel subepithelial connective tissue graft: a clinical report.
Zabalegui I; Sicilia A; Cambra J; Gil J; Sanz M
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1999 Apr; 19(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 10635186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of root coverage with two connective tissue grafts obtained from the same location.
Harris RJ; Harris LE; Harris CR; Harris AJ
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Aug; 27(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 17726989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Root coverage: a comparison of techniques: the free gingival graft versus the subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Sonick M
Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1992 Oct; 4(8):39-48. PubMed ID: 1286177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recessions: six- to 12-month changes.
de Souza SL; Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Taba M; Grisi MF; de Andrade PF
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 10(3):87-94. PubMed ID: 18714934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Full-thickness flap/subepithelial connective tissue grafting with intramarrow penetrations: three case reports of lingual root coverage.
Wilcko MT; Wilcko WM; Murphy KG; Carroll WJ; Ferguson DJ; Miley DD; Bouquot JE
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Dec; 25(6):561-9. PubMed ID: 16353531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The connective tissue with partial thickness double pedicle graft: the results of 100 consecutively-treated defects.
Harris RJ
J Periodontol; 1994 May; 65(5):448-61. PubMed ID: 8046561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Periodontal microsurgery: report of 16 cases consecutively treated by the free rotated papilla autograft technique combined with the coronally advanced flap.
Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Testori T; Weinstein RL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Jun; 24(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 15227775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Root coverage with subepithelial connective tissue grafts and modified tunnel technique. An evaluation of long-term results.
Tözüm TF
N Y State Dent J; 2006; 72(4):38-41. PubMed ID: 16925012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
