140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9497733)
1. Comparison of mucogingival changes following treatment with coronally positioned flap and guided tissue regeneration procedures.
Trombelli L; Tatakis DN; Scabbia A; Zimmerman GJ
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Oct; 17(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 9497733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 2 techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions.
Cordioli G; Mortarino C; Chierico A; Grusovin MG; Majzoub Z
J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1470-6. PubMed ID: 11759857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Guided tissue regeneration versus mucogingival surgery in the treatment of human buccal gingival recession.
Pini Prato G; Tinti C; Vincenzi G; Magnani C; Cortellini P; Clauser C
J Periodontol; 1992 Nov; 63(11):919-28. PubMed ID: 1453307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a biodegradable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession. A 6-year follow-up study.
Leknes KN; Amarante ES; Price DE; Bøe OE; Skavland RJ; Lie T
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):518-29. PubMed ID: 15842269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mucogingival versus guided tissue regeneration procedures in the treatment of deep recession type defects.
Zucchelli G; Clauser C; De Sanctis M; Calandriello M
J Periodontol; 1998 Feb; 69(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 9526912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A two-year prospective study of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft.
de Queiroz Côrtes A; Sallum AW; Casati MZ; Nociti FH; Sallum EA
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Sep; 33(9):683-9. PubMed ID: 16856894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A preliminary comparative study of the guided tissue regeneration and free gingival graft procedures for adjacent facial root coverage.
Ito K; Oshio K; Shiomi N; Murai S
Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):319-26. PubMed ID: 11203942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Elimination of isolated gingival atrophy by laterally positioned flap and free mucogingival autografts in combination with coronally positioned flap].
Kovaćević K; Leković V
Stomatol Glas Srb; 1991; 37(4):393-401. PubMed ID: 1785128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment of gingival recessions by guided tissue regeneration and coronally advanced flap.
Banihashemrad A; Aghassizadeh E; Radvar M
N Y State Dent J; 2009 Jan; 75(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 19280831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Guided tissue regeneration and a free gingival graft for the management of buccal recession: a case report.
Prato GP; Clauser C; Cortellini P
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Dec; 13(6):486-93. PubMed ID: 8181909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Guided tissue regeneration versus mucogingival surgery in the treatment of human buccal recessions. A 4-year follow-up study.
Pini Prato G; Clauser C; Cortellini P; Tinti C; Vincenzi G; Pagliaro U
J Periodontol; 1996 Nov; 67(11):1216-23. PubMed ID: 8959573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Plastic periodontal surgery].
Kleinfelder JW
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2002 Nov; 109(11):458-62. PubMed ID: 12494709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recessions: six- to 12-month changes.
de Souza SL; Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Taba M; Grisi MF; de Andrade PF
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 10(3):87-94. PubMed ID: 18714934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of bone grafts for the enhancement of a GTR-based root coverage procedure: a pilot case study.
Wang HL; Kimble K; Eber R
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Apr; 22(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 12019707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of 2 root coverage techniques: guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable matrix style membrane versus a connective tissue graft combined with a coronally positioned pedicle graft without vertical incisions. results of a series of consecutive cases.
Harris RJ
J Periodontol; 1998 Dec; 69(12):1426-34. PubMed ID: 9926774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Failure of root coverage of shallow gingival recessions employing GTR and a bioresorbable membrane.
Müller HP; Stahl M; Eger T
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Apr; 21(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 11829391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Periodontal microsurgery: report of 16 cases consecutively treated by the free rotated papilla autograft technique combined with the coronally advanced flap.
Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Testori T; Weinstein RL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Jun; 24(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 15227775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Healing of gingival recessions using a collagen membrane with a hemineralized xenograft: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Cardaropoli D; Cardaropoli G
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Feb; 29(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 19244883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coronally positioned flap with subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage: various indications and flap designs.
Martorelli de Lima AF; da Silva RC; Joly JC; Tatakis DN
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2006 Apr; 8(2):53-60. PubMed ID: 16623180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Alteration of gingival dimensions in a complicated case of gingival recession.
Müller HP; Eger T; Schorb A
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1998 Aug; 18(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 12693421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
