These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9497740)

  • 1. The dual bonding technique: a modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures.
    Paul SJ; Schärer P
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Dec; 17(6):536-45. PubMed ID: 9497740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of dentin adhesives used as sealers and provisional cementation on bond strength of a resin cement to dentin.
    Chieffi N; Sadek F; Monticelli F; Goracci C; Grandini S; Davidson C; Tay FR; Ferrari M
    Am J Dent; 2006 Apr; 19(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 16764131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of dentin adhesive and cure mode on film thickness and microtensile bond strength to dentin in indirect restorations.
    Coelho Santos MJ; Navarro MF; Tam L; McComb D
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 15765957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin.
    Hikita K; Van Meerbeek B; De Munck J; Ikeda T; Van Landuyt K; Maida T; Lambrechts P; Peumans M
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16426673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of ZOE temporary restoration on resin-dentin bond strength using different adhesive strategies.
    Carvalho CN; de Oliveira Bauer JR; Loguercio AD; Reis A
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(3):144-52; discussion 153. PubMed ID: 17518904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement.
    Magne P; So WS; Cascione D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):166-74. PubMed ID: 17854617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reverse spot bonding: a novel technique for provisionalization with immediate dentin sealing.
    Schoenbaum TR; Ercus S; Snowden J
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2012 May; 33(5):374-7. PubMed ID: 22616222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bond strength of one-bottle dentin bonding agents on human dentin.
    Holderegger C; Paul SJ; Lüthy H; Schärer P
    Am J Dent; 1997 Apr; 10(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 9545893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites.
    Haller B; Hässner K; Moll K
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):574-84. PubMed ID: 14531604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of eugenol-containing temporary cements on bond strength of composite to dentin.
    Ganss C; Jung M
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 9573789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of eugenol-containing temporary restorations on bond strength of composite to dentin.
    Yap AU; Shah KC; Loh ET; Sim SS; Tan CC
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 11699178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro push-out strength of seven luting agents to dentin.
    Cheylan JM; Gonthier S; Degrange M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 12170851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monkey pulpal response to adhesively luted indirect resin composite inlays.
    Inokoshi S; Shimada Y; Fujitani M; Otsuki M; Shono T; Onoe N; Morigami M; Takatsu T
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(3):111-8. PubMed ID: 7479188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conventional cementation technique for Targis restorations.
    Tysowsky GW
    Signature; 1998; 5(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 9543866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations.
    Magne P; Kim TH; Cascione D; Donovan TE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Dec; 94(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 16316797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.