These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9497753)

  • 1. Wear of visible light-cured restorative materials and removable partial denture direct retainers.
    Latta GH; Wicks RA; Huget EF; Murray GA
    J Prosthodont; 1997 Jun; 6(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 9497753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bonding of resin composites to resin-modified glass ionomers.
    Fortin D; Vargas MA; Swift EJ
    Am J Dent; 1995 Aug; 8(4):201-4. PubMed ID: 7576388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro investigation of the wear of resin composite materials and cast direct retainers during removable partial denture placement and removal.
    Tietge JD; Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Leary JM; Aquilino SA
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 1524635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH.
    Shabanian M; Richards LC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 12131888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins.
    Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wear Resistance of Bulk-fill Composite Resin Restorative Materials Polymerized under different Curing Intensities.
    Alkhudhairy F
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jan; 18(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 28050983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative wear ranking of dental restoratives with the BIOMAT wear simulator.
    Yap AU; Ong LF; Teoh SH; Hastings GW
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Mar; 26(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 10194732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro deformation of acetyl resin and metal alloy removable partial denture direct retainers.
    Wu JC; Latta GH; Wicks RA; Swords RL; Scarbecz M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Dec; 90(6):586-90. PubMed ID: 14668760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wear testing of composite, gold, porcelain, and enamel opposing a removable cobalt-chromium partial denture alloy.
    Alarcon JV; Engelmeier RL; Powers JM; Triolo PT
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):421-6. PubMed ID: 19374708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative wear resistance of reinforced glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Yap AU; Teo JC; Teoh SH
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 11504433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bond strengths of fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
    Fruits TJ; Duncanson MG; Miller RC
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):219-22. PubMed ID: 9545909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hardness and wear resistance of two resin composites cured with equivalent radiant exposure from a low irradiance LED and QTH light-curing units.
    Ramp LC; Broome JC; Ramp MH
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 16555655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occlusal contact area (OCA) wear of two new composite restoratives.
    Yap AU
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Feb; 29(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 11856400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of three bleaching agents on the surface properties of three different esthetic restorative materials.
    Turker SB; Biskin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):466-73. PubMed ID: 12806324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-body in vitro wear study of some current dental composites and amalgams.
    Hu X; Marquis PM; Shortall AC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 10424987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wear resistance of four luting agents as a function of marginal gap distance, cement type, and restorative material.
    Guzman AF; Moore BK; Andres CJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(5):415-25. PubMed ID: 9495160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials.
    Attin T; Vataschki M; Hellwig E
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 9063235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preparation of composite retentive areas for removable partial denture retainers.
    Pavarina AC; Machado AL; Vergani CE; Giampaolo ET
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Aug; 88(2):218-20. PubMed ID: 12397251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of long-term simulated RPD clasp attachment/detachment on retention loss and wear for two clasp types and three abutment material surfaces.
    Helal MA; Baraka OA; Sanad ME; Ludwig K; Kern M
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):370-7. PubMed ID: 22443158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stress distribution and abutment tooth mobility of distal-extension removable partial dentures with different retainers: an in vivo study.
    Igarashi Y; Ogata A; Kuroiwa A; Wang CH
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Feb; 26(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 10080307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.