These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9497820)

  • 21. Augmentation with silicone stabilizes proximal femur fractures: an in vitro biomechanical study.
    van der Steenhoven TJ; Schaasberg W; de Vries AC; Valstar ER; Nelissen RG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Mar; 24(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 19168267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multidirectional in vivo strain analysis of the equine radius and tibia during dynamic loading with and without a cast.
    Schneider RK; Milne DW; Gabel AA; Groom JJ; Bramlage LR
    Am J Vet Res; 1982 Sep; 43(9):1541-50. PubMed ID: 7149401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The development of a physiological hip prosthesis: evaluation of the strains after implantation of a prototype of hip implant: experiment in a dry femur.
    Vander Sloten J; Labey L; Van Audekercke R; Van der Perre G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1993; 3(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 8490530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Compression or tension? The stress distribution in the proximal femur.
    Rudman KE; Aspden RM; Meakin JR
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():12. PubMed ID: 16504005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Finite element analysis of changes in femoral stresses after elite total hip arthroplasty].
    He RX; Luo YM; Yan SG; Wu HB
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 84(18):1549-53. PubMed ID: 15500718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Circumferential and axial strain in the proximal femur: effect of prosthesis type and position.
    McBeath AA; Schopler SA; Narechania RG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980; (150):301-5. PubMed ID: 7428236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patterns of strain in the macaque tibia during functional activity.
    Demes B; Qin YX; Stern JT; Larson SG; Rubin CT
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2001 Dec; 116(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 11745077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Femoroacetabular impingement alters hip and pelvic biomechanics during gait Walking biomechanics of FAI.
    Kennedy MJ; Lamontagne M; Beaulé PE
    Gait Posture; 2009 Jul; 30(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 19307121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Elastic properties and masticatory bone stress in the macaque mandible.
    Dechow PC; Hylander WL
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2000 Aug; 112(4):553-74. PubMed ID: 10918129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
    Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Biodynamics of the hip joint. The elasticity of the human femur and its importance].
    Wenzl HR
    Fortschr Med; 1976 Jan; 94(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 1254220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tension band wire fixation for valgus osteotomies of the proximal femur: a biomechanical study of three configurations of fixation.
    Volpon JB; Batista LC; Shimano MM; Moro CA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 May; 23(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 18187241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Finite element analysis of a three-dimensional model of a proximal femur-cemented femoral THJR component construct: influence of assigned interface conditions on strain energy density.
    Lewis G; Duggineni R
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(5):319-27. PubMed ID: 17075167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Supracondylar femur fracture fixation: mechanical comparison of the 95 degrees condylar side plate and screw versus 95 degrees angled blade plate.
    Jaakkola JI; Lundy DW; Moore T; Jones B; Ganey TM; Hutton WC
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Jan; 73(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 11928916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biomechanical comparison of two side plate fixation techniques in an unstable intertrochanteric osteotomy model: Sliding Hip Screw and Percutaneous Compression Plate.
    Krischak GD; Augat P; Beck A; Arand M; Baier B; Blakytny R; Gebhard F; Claes L
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Dec; 22(10):1112-8. PubMed ID: 17900766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. ESB Clinical Biomechanics Award 2008: Complete data of total knee replacement loading for level walking and stair climbing measured in vivo with a follow-up of 6-10 months.
    Heinlein B; Kutzner I; Graichen F; Bender A; Rohlmann A; Halder AM; Beier A; Bergmann G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 May; 24(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 19285767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An in vitro comparison of surface strain patterns in cementless femoral arthroplasty.
    Boggan RS
    Semin Arthroplasty; 1993 Jul; 4(3):143-53. PubMed ID: 10146280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Simulation of physiological loading in total hip replacements.
    Ramos A; Fonseca F; Simões JA
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Aug; 128(4):579-87. PubMed ID: 16813449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of bone strain measurements at anatomically relevant sites using surface gauges versus strain gauged bone staples.
    Milgrom C; Finestone A; Hamel A; Mandes V; Burr D; Sharkey N
    J Biomech; 2004 Jun; 37(6):947-52. PubMed ID: 15111084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Postural balance during quiet standing in patients with total hip arthroplasty and surface replacement arthroplasty.
    Nantel J; Termoz N; Centomo H; Lavigne M; Vendittoli PA; Prince F
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 May; 23(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 18079029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.