These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Effect of electrode type and position on motor unit action potential configuration. Butler BP; Ball RD; Albers JW Muscle Nerve; 1982; 5(9S):S95-7. PubMed ID: 7170002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Duration of motor unit potentials from fine-wire electrodes. Basmajian JV; Cross GL Am J Phys Med; 1971 Jun; 50(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 5579072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between the size of the recording electrodes and morphology of the compound muscle action potentials. Wee AS; Ashley RA Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 30(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 2351092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Properties of motor unit action potentials recorded with concentric and monopolar needle electrodes: ADEMG analysis. Howard JE; McGill KC; Dorfman LJ Muscle Nerve; 1988 Oct; 11(10):1051-5. PubMed ID: 3185599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An improved surface electrode for monitoring myopotentials. Hollis LI; Harrison E Am J Occup Ther; 1970; 24(1):28-30. PubMed ID: 5412374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The velopharyngeal muscles in speech. An electromyographic and cinéradiographic study. Fritzell B Acta Otolaryngol; 1969; ():Suppl 250:1+. PubMed ID: 5383712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of the volume conduction on the shape of the action potentials recorded by various types of needle electrodes in normal human muscle. Kosarov D; Gydikov A Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1975; 15(4):319-35. PubMed ID: 1192996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Vectorelectromyographic control on the position of surface electrodes in relation to active motor units in the human muscles. Kosarov D Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg; 1974; 1():85-93. PubMed ID: 4466328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Propagation of compound muscle action potentials measured with small surface recording electrodes. Hong CZ; Liberson WT Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1987; 27(6-7):415-7. PubMed ID: 3428220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Electromyographic measurement of the masticatory muscles]. Knoops P Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1983 Apr; 17(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 6585888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of the EMG amplifier filter settings on the motor unit action potential parameters recorded with concentric and monopolar needles. Chu J; Chan RC; Bruyninckx F Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Dec; 26(8):627-39. PubMed ID: 3830043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The influence of varying parameters on the electromyogram recorded by surface electrodes. II. The influence of distance, surface area and pressure of the electrodes on recordable muscular electrical activity]. Kramer H; Frauendorf H; Küchler G Acta Biol Med Ger; 1972; 28(3):489-96. PubMed ID: 5049640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Electromyography and nerve conduction measurements. Nagler W Am Fam Physician; 1974 Sep; 10(3):89-97. PubMed ID: 4369979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative comparison of motor unit potential parameters between monopolar and concentric needles. Chan RC; Hsu TC Muscle Nerve; 1991 Oct; 14(10):1028-32. PubMed ID: 1944402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of the method of recording motor unit action potentials in man with a needle electrode. Khamitov KhS; Bogdanov EI; Khabirov FA Hum Physiol; 1985; 11(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 4077066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. "Facial" and standard concentric needle electrodes are not interchangeable. Barkhaus PE; Roberts MM; Nandedkar SD Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Sep; 46(5):259-61. PubMed ID: 17059096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]