These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9498190)

  • 21. Comparison of the Plusoptix A09 and Retinomax K-Plus 3 with retinoscopy in children.
    Yilmaz I; Ozkaya A; Alkin Z; Ozbengi S; Yazici AT; Demirok A
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2015; 52(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 25643369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of a clinical aberrometer for lower-order accuracy and repeatability, higher-order repeatability, and instrument myopia.
    Salmon TO; van de Pol C
    Optometry; 2005 Aug; 76(8):461-72. PubMed ID: 16150413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the refractive measurements with hand-held autorefractometer, table-mounted autorefractometer and cycloplegic retinoscopy in children.
    Akil H; Keskin S; Çavdarli C
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 26028946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of confidence number on the screening accuracy of the retinomax autorefractor.
    VISION IN PRESCHOOLERS STUDY GROUP
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 84(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 17435531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical evaluation of refraction using a handheld wavefront autorefractor in young and adult patients.
    Schimitzek T; Wesemann W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Sep; 28(9):1655-66. PubMed ID: 12231328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of cycloplegia in objective refraction.
    Jorge J; Queiros A; González-Méijome J; Fernandes P; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jul; 25(4):340-5. PubMed ID: 15953119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effectiveness of an autorefractor with eye-tracking capability in pediatric patients.
    Kirschen D; Isenberg SJ
    J AAPOS; 2014 Jun; 18(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 24924271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diagnostic accuracy and variability of autorefraction by the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer and the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001 in relation to subjective refraction.
    Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Patel PM; Lin PF; Marshall J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Mar; 29(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 19236587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of the Retinomax autorefractor with hand-held retinoscopy in 1-year-old infants.
    Gole GA; Schluter PJ; Hall J; Colville D
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2003 Aug; 31(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 12880461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of the Retinomax K-plus3 in measuring refractive error in a pediatric population.
    Peng MY; Matta N; Silbert D; Tian J; Singman E
    J AAPOS; 2014 Aug; 18(4):327-31. PubMed ID: 25173893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Plusoptix Vision Screener: the accuracy and repeatability of refractive measurements using a new autorefractor.
    Dahlmann-Noor AH; Comyn O; Kostakis V; Misra A; Gupta N; Heath J; Brown J; Iron A; McGill S; Vrotsou K; Vivian AJ
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 93(3):346-9. PubMed ID: 19001013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hand-Held Nidek versus Table-Mounted Huvitz Autorefractors and Their Agreement with Subjective Refraction in Adults.
    Sayed KM; Alsmman AH; Mostafa EM
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2021; 15():1391-1401. PubMed ID: 33833497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Accuracy of measurements of video-refractometry in higher ametropia].
    Schimitzek T; Krzizok T
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Jun; 218(6):438-44. PubMed ID: 11488011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the handheld Retinomax K-Plus2 and on-table autokeratometers in children with and without cycloplegia.
    Liang CL; Hung KS; Park N; Chan P; Juo SH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Mar; 30(3):669-74. PubMed ID: 15050266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of the results of four different refraction measurement devices in children with retinoscopy.
    Simsek M; Oral Y; Erogul O; Sabaner MC; Simsek C; Yorukoglu S
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2022; 66(4):337-343. PubMed ID: 36589324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validation of aberrometry-based relative peripheral refraction measurements.
    Berntsen DA; Mutti DO; Zadnik K
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 18201339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Noncycloplegic photorefractive screening in pre-school children with the "PowerRefractor" in a pediatric practice.
    Schaeffel F; Mathis U; Brüggemann G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):630-9. PubMed ID: 17632312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Comparisons of manual and automatic refractometry with subjective results].
    Wübbolt IS; von Alven S; Hülssner O; Erb C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):904-7. PubMed ID: 17131251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of aberrometer and autorefractor measures of refractive error in children.
    Martinez AA; Pandian A; Sankaridurg P; Rose K; Huynh SC; Mitchell P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 83(11):811-7. PubMed ID: 17106401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.