These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9498212)

  • 1. [Local effects and changes in wound drainage in the free peritoneal cavity].
    Ernst R; Wiemer C; Rembs E; Friemann J; Theile A; Schäfer K; Zumtobel V
    Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1997; 382(6):380-92. PubMed ID: 9498212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Latex and silicone drains in surgery − is the ban on rubber drains really a step forward or rather a step back?
    Hrubovčák J; Dudík I; Voves J; Roman J; Jalůvka F; Jelínek P; Slívová I; Tesař M; Vávra P; Tulinský L
    Rozhl Chir; 2022; 101(11):525-529. PubMed ID: 36717259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combined Penrose and silicone drains provide excellent drainage.
    Okudaira Y; Sugimachi K; Matsumata T; Hanawa S
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Nov; 165(5):449-50. PubMed ID: 3313775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective, controlled study of prophylactic drainage after colonic anastomoses.
    Hoffmann J; Shokouh-Amiri MH; Damm P; Jensen R
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1987 Jun; 30(6):449-52. PubMed ID: 3595364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic retrieval of retained intraperitoneal drains in the immediate postoperative period.
    Liao CS; Shieh MC
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2011 Mar; 74(3):138-9. PubMed ID: 21421210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A bacteriologic study comparing closed suction and simple conduit drainage.
    Raves JJ; Slifkin M; Diamond DL
    Am J Surg; 1984 Nov; 148(5):618-20. PubMed ID: 6496851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Slit drainage versus Redon drainage in a clinical comparison--initial experiences with a new kind of wound drainage system].
    Brandner P; Neis KJ; Hettenbach A; Schmidt W
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 May; 51(5):393-7. PubMed ID: 1869010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of surgical drainage materials on colonic healing.
    Smith SR; Connolly JC; Crane PW; Gilmore OJ
    Br J Surg; 1982 Mar; 69(3):153-5. PubMed ID: 7066655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The rubber dam as a means to isolate contaminated peritoneal defects after colonic resection.
    Meijer RW; Verschueren RC; Oldhoff J
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1984 Nov; 27(11):703-6. PubMed ID: 6499603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binding of Escherichia coli to Penrose rubber drains--an in vitro study.
    Guo W; Andersson R; Shen W; Ljungh A; Bengmark S; Wadström T
    Zentralbl Bakteriol; 1993 Feb; 278(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 8518515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional longevity of intraperioneal drains: an experimental evaluation.
    Agrama HM; Blackwood JM; Brown CS; Machiedo GW; Rush BF
    Am J Surg; 1976 Sep; 132(3):418-21. PubMed ID: 962023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of abdominal drains in perforated duodenal ulcer patients: a prospective controlled study.
    Pai D; Sharma A; Kanungo R; Jagdish S; Gupta A
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1999 Mar; 69(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 10075361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Latex rubber (Penrose drain) is detrimental to esophagogastric anastomotic healing in rats.
    Cui Y; Urschel JD
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2000 Jun; 41(3):479-81. PubMed ID: 10952345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental assessment of the drainage capacity of small silastic chest drains.
    Niinami H; Tabata M; Takeuchi Y; Umezu M
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2006 Jun; 14(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 16714700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wound drains after incisional hernia repair.
    Gurusamy KS; Samraj K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jan; (1):CD005570. PubMed ID: 17253563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of intra-abdominal drainages on adhesion formation and prevention by phospholipids in a rat model. Drainages and adhesion formation.
    Bertram P; Treutner KH; Tietze L; Vicas M; Weiss C; Anurov M; Titkova S; Polivoda M; Oettinger AP; Schumpelick V
    Eur Surg Res; 2003; 35(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 12679618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Post-operative abdominal drainage following major upper gastrointestinal surgery: single drain versus two drains.
    Shrikhande SV; Barreto SG; Shetty G; Suradkar K; Bodhankar YD; Shah SB; Goel M
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2013; 9(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 23771371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A simple, novel technique for fixing Penrose drains in minor surgeries, with advantages for remote outpatient clinics: a retrospective comparison with conventional drain fixation in North Ibaraki, Japan.
    Shibuya Y; Matsumoto G; Sasaki M; Sasaki K; Adachi K; Sekido M
    Rural Remote Health; 2017; 17(4):4159. PubMed ID: 28978204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.
    Peng S; Cheng Y; Yang C; Lu J; Wu S; Zhou R; Cheng N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Aug; (8):CD010583. PubMed ID: 26292656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simple elective cholecystectomy: to drain or not.
    Lewis RT; Goodall RG; Marien B; Park M; Lloyd-Smith W; Wiegand FM
    Am J Surg; 1990 Feb; 159(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 2405730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.