144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9498351)
1. Estimation of dominance variance in purebred Yorkshire swine.
Culbertson MS; Mabry JW; Misztal I; Gengler N; Bertrand JK; Varona L
J Anim Sci; 1998 Feb; 76(2):448-51. PubMed ID: 9498351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic parameters and trends for litter traits in U.S. Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and Landrace pigs.
Chen P; Baas TJ; Mabry JW; Koehler KJ; Dekkers JC
J Anim Sci; 2003 Jan; 81(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 12597371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of pen mates on growth, backfat depth, and longissimus muscle area of swine.
Hsu WL; Johnson RK; Van Vleck LD
J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):895-902. PubMed ID: 19933426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Animal model estimation of genetic parameters and response to selection for litter size and weight, growth, and backfat in closed seedstock populations of large white and Landrace swine.
Ferraz JB; Johnson RK
J Anim Sci; 1993 Apr; 71(4):850-8. PubMed ID: 8478287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dissecting total genetic variance into additive and dominance components of purebred and crossbred pig traits.
Tusell L; Gilbert H; Vitezica ZG; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
Animal; 2019 Nov; 13(11):2429-2439. PubMed ID: 31120005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The contribution of dominance and inbreeding depression in estimating variance components for litter size in Pannon White rabbits.
Nagy I; Gorjanc G; Curik I; Farkas J; Kiszlinger H; Szendrő Z
J Anim Breed Genet; 2013 Aug; 130(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 23855632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variance component estimates for alternative litter size traits in swine.
Putz AM; Tiezzi F; Maltecca C; Gray KA; Knauer MT
J Anim Sci; 2015 Nov; 93(11):5153-63. PubMed ID: 26641035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic parameters and trends for production traits and their relationship with litter traits in Landrace and Yorkshire pigs.
Lopez BIM; Song C; Seo K
Anim Sci J; 2018 Oct; 89(10):1381-1388. PubMed ID: 30073716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic parameter estimates from joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine using the crossbred model.
Lutaaya E; Misztal I; Mabry JW; Short T; Timm HH; Holzbauer R
J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):3002-7. PubMed ID: 11811453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A bivariate genomic model with additive, dominance and inbreeding depression effects for sire line and three-way crossbred pigs.
Christensen OF; Nielsen B; Su G; Xiang T; Madsen P; Ostersen T; Velander I; Strathe AB
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Aug; 51(1):45. PubMed ID: 31426753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of dominance variance for live body weight in a crossbred population of pigs.
Dufrasne M; Faux P; Piedboeuf M; Wavreille J; Gengler N
J Anim Sci; 2014 Oct; 92(10):4313-8. PubMed ID: 25149333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breed-specific adjustment factors for reproductive traits in Duroc, Hampshire, Landrace, and Yorkshire swine.
Culbertson MS; Mabry JW; Bertrand JK; Nelson AH
J Anim Sci; 1997 Sep; 75(9):2362-7. PubMed ID: 9303454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomic prediction using models with dominance and imprinting effects for backfat thickness and average daily gain in Danish Duroc pigs.
Guo X; Christensen OF; Ostersen T; Wang Y; Lund MS; Su G
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Sep; 48(1):67. PubMed ID: 27623617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of variances for gametic effects on litter size in Yorkshire and Landrace swine.
Stella A; Stalder KJ; Saxton AM; Boettcher PJ
J Anim Sci; 2003 Sep; 81(9):2171-8. PubMed ID: 12968691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dominance models with method R for stature of Holsteins.
Misztal I; Lawlor TJ; Fernando RL
J Dairy Sci; 1997 May; 80(5):975-8. PubMed ID: 9178138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of the dominance variance for postweaning gain in the U.S. Limousin population.
Gengler N; Misztal I; Bertrand JK; Culbertson MS
J Anim Sci; 1998 Oct; 76(10):2515-20. PubMed ID: 9814888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of dominance relationships on the estimation of dominance variance with sire-dam subclass effects.
Gengler N; Van Vleck LD; MacNeil MD; Misztal I; Pariacote FA
J Anim Sci; 1997 Nov; 75(11):2885-91. PubMed ID: 9374300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic and phenotypic parameters estimated from Nebraska specific-pathogen-free swine field records.
David PJ; Johnson RK; Socha TE
J Anim Sci; 1983 Nov; 57(5):1117-23. PubMed ID: 6227597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of variance components from field data for number of pigs born alive.
See MT; Mabry JW; Bertrand JK
J Anim Sci; 1993 Nov; 71(11):2905-9. PubMed ID: 8270513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
