These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 949893)

  • 1. A three-year study of the copper T 200 intrauterine device.
    Gupta HD; Devi PK
    Contraception; 1976 Aug; 14(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 949893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Copper T 220C: a new long-acting copper intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Cooper DL; Millen AK; Mishell DR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jan; 124(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 1247047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A statistical study of the copper T and copper 7 intrauterine devices.
    Gupta HD; Gupta I; Devi PK
    Contraception; 1976 Dec; 14(6):655-60. PubMed ID: 1017199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experience with the copper-T and Silicone Shell Loop in parous women: a randomized study.
    Roy S; Azen SP; Mishell DR; Pike MC; Casagrande J
    Contraception; 1976 Mar; 13(3):365-74. PubMed ID: 1248259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preliminary report on a postpartum CuT 200 study, Santiago, Chile.
    Lavin P; Waszak C; Bravo C
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1983 Feb; 21(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 6133798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of three different models of the copper T intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Roy S; Casagrande J; Cooper DL; Mishell DR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Jul; 134(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 453297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two years' experience with two levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and one copper-releasing intrauterine device: a randomized comparative performance study.
    Nilsson CG; Allonen H; Diaz J; Luukkainen T
    Fertil Steril; 1983 Feb; 39(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 6401636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of copper T-200 with Lippes loop as a contraceptive device.
    Wright EA; Aisien OA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Jun; 29(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 2568294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors affecting intrauterine contraceptive device performance. I. Endometrial cavity length.
    Hasson HM; Berger GS; Edelman DA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Dec; 126(8):973-81. PubMed ID: 998687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Immediate postplacental insertion of GYNE-T 380 and GYNE-T 380 postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: randomized study.
    Tatum HJ; Beltran RS; Ramos R; Van Kets H; Sivin I; Schmidt FH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Nov; 175(5):1231-5. PubMed ID: 8942493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rates and outcomes of planned pregnancy after use of Norplant capsules, Norplant II rods, or levonorgestrel-releasing or copper TCu 380Ag intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Sivin I; Stern J; Diaz S; Pavéz M; Alvarez F; Brache V; Mishell DR; Lacarra M; McCarthy T; Holma P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Apr; 166(4):1208-13. PubMed ID: 1566771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Randomized comparison of clinical performance of two copper-releasing IUDs, NOVA-T and Copper-T-200, in Denmark, Finland and Sweden with a special reference on pelvic infection].
    Luukkainen T; Nelsen NC; Nygren KG; Piorala T
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1979 Jul; 7(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 12335998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A collaborative study of the progesterone intrauterine device (Progestasert). The World Health Organization Task Force on Methods for the Regulation of Implantation.
    Newton J; Szontagh F; Lebech P; Rowe P
    Contraception; 1979 Jun; 19(6):575-89. PubMed ID: 487808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative randomized study of the copper-T 200 and Dalkon Shield intrauterine devices.
    Spellacy WN; Birk SA; Gordon L
    Contraception; 1975 Oct; 12(4):453-63. PubMed ID: 1192734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. One-year clinical experience with FlexiGard.
    Batar I
    Contraception; 1992 Oct; 46(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 1486769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical study of a progesterone-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Brenner PF; Cooper DL; Mishell DR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Mar; 121(5):704-6. PubMed ID: 1115173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Five years' experience of intrauterine contraception with the Nova-T and the Copper-T-200.
    Luukkainen T; Allonen H; Nielsen NC; Nygren KG; Pyörälä T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Dec; 147(8):885-92. PubMed ID: 6650625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical studies on Cu-7; copper-IUD.
    Matsumoto S
    Nihon Funin Gakkai Zasshi; 1976 Jul; 21(3):70-82. PubMed ID: 12158549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Menstrual characteristics and ultrasonographic uterine cavity measurements predict bleeding and pain in nulligravid women using intrauterine contraception.
    Kaislasuo J; Heikinheimo O; Lähteenmäki P; Suhonen S
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1580-8. PubMed ID: 25990577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.