These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 949893)
41. A three-year study of the copper-7 minigravigard intrauterine contraceptive device in nulliparous women. Srisupandit S J Med Assoc Thai; 1988 Jun; 71(6):294-7. PubMed ID: 3171448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Randomized clinical study of the TCu-380 A and the TCu-200 B. IUDs. Kandil OF; El-sheikha Z; Hamza A Popul Sci; 1991 Jan; 10():35-40. PubMed ID: 12284660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Comparative study of the acceptability of inert and copper-containing intrauterine contraceptive devices]. Manuilova IA; Dubnitskaia LV Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1988 Nov; (11):47-50. PubMed ID: 3239684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Transdermal estrogen with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device for climacteric complaints: clinical and endometrial responses. Raudaskoski TH; Lahti EI; Kauppila AJ; Apaja-Sarkkinen MA; Laatikainen TJ Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 172(1 Pt 1):114-9. PubMed ID: 7847516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Intrauterine device developments. Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1984; 5(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 12313225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The LEM device in an immediate postpartum contraception program. Apelo R; Ramos R; Thomas M Fertil Steril; 1976 May; 27(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 1278454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The use effectiveness of the Copper T-200 in Matlab, Bangladesh. Rob U; Phillips JF; Chakraborty J; Koenig MA Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1987 Aug; 25(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 2887467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Four years of a comparative study with Nova T and Copper T 200 IUDS. Nielsen NC; Pyörälä T; Allonen H; Nygren KG; Luukkainen T Contraception; 1982 Jul; 26(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 7128132 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Twelve-month contraceptive continuation and repeat pregnancy among young mothers choosing postdelivery contraceptive implants or postplacental intrauterine devices. Cohen R; Sheeder J; Arango N; Teal SB; Tocce K Contraception; 2016 Feb; 93(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 26475368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Performance of copper intrauterine devices when inserted after an expulsion. Bahamondes L; Díaz J; Marchi NM; Petta CA; Cristofoletti ML; Gomez G Hum Reprod; 1995 Nov; 10(11):2917-8. PubMed ID: 8747044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Clinical experience with the GYNE-T 380 postpartum intrauterine device. Van Kets H; Kleinhout J; Osler M; Parewijck W; Zighelboim I; Tatum HJ Fertil Steril; 1991 Jun; 55(6):1144-9. PubMed ID: 2037108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A clinical study comparing the performance of three IUCDs (Multiload Copper 250, Copper T 200, and Lippes Loop C). Fakhr MM; Fakhr DM; Hassan AA; Nasser NM Popul Sci; 1988; 8():39-53. PubMed ID: 12316112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A study on the contraceptive effectiveness of a newly designed IUD "FD-1" in Japan. Wagatsuma T; Sakamoto S; Matsuyama E; Amenomori Y; Kobayashi T; Takada M; Matsuda S; Fujimoto S; Shimizu T; Suzuki M; Ishihama A; Nakanishi T; Sunouchi S; Sekiba K Contraception; 1978 Jan; 17(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 627148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]