These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9500153)

  • 1. LOCS III versus the Oxford Clinical Cataract Classification and Grading System for the assessment of nuclear, cortical and posterior subcapsular cataract.
    Hall AB; Thompson JR; Deane JS; Rosenthal AR
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 1997 Dec; 4(4):179-94. PubMed ID: 9500153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group.
    Chylack LT; Wolfe JK; Singer DM; Leske MC; Bullimore MA; Bailey IL; Friend J; McCarthy D; Wu SY
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 Jun; 111(6):831-6. PubMed ID: 8512486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevalence of lenticular abnormalities in a population-based study: Oxford Clinical Cataract Grading in the Melton Eye Study.
    Deane JS; Hall AB; Thompson JR; Rosenthal AR
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 1997 Dec; 4(4):195-206. PubMed ID: 9500154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of cataract severity and morphology on the reliability of the Lens Opacities Classification System II (LOCS II).
    Maraini G; Pasquini P; Sperduto RD; Bonacini M; Carrieri MP; Corona R; Graziosi P; Tomba MC; Williams SL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1991 Jul; 32(8):2400-3. PubMed ID: 2071351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lens Opacities Classification System.
    Chylack LT; Leske MC; Sperduto R; Khu P; McCarthy D
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1988 Mar; 106(3):330-4. PubMed ID: 3345149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Associations between lens features assessed in the Oxford Clinical Cataract Classification and Grading System.
    Thompson JR; Deane JS; Hall AB; Rosenthal AR
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 1997 Dec; 4(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 9500155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of two photographic systems for grading cataract.
    Taylor HR; Lee JA; Wang F; Muñoz B
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1991 Mar; 32(3):529-32. PubMed ID: 2001927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitating cataract and nuclear brunescence, the Harvard and LOCS systems.
    Chylack LT; Wolfe JK; Friend J; Khu PM; Singer DM; McCarthy D; del Carmen J; Rosner B
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Nov; 70(11):886-95. PubMed ID: 8302524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of lens opacities classification system III applied at the slitlamp.
    Karbassi M; Khu PM; Singer DM; Chylack LT
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Nov; 70(11):923-8. PubMed ID: 8302528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simplified cataract grading system.
    Thylefors B; Chylack LT; Konyama K; Sasaki K; Sperduto R; Taylor HR; West S;
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2002 Apr; 9(2):83-95. PubMed ID: 11821974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subjective (LOCS II) versus objective (BGS) measures of cortical and subcapsular cataracts in retroillumination photographs.
    Khu PM; Kashiwagi T
    Ophthalmic Res; 1990; 22 Suppl 1():68-70. PubMed ID: 2388754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation of nuclear cataract lens density using Scheimpflug images with Lens Opacities Classification System III and visual function.
    Grewal DS; Brar GS; Grewal SP
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Aug; 116(8):1436-43. PubMed ID: 19500847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective Assessment of Nuclear and Cortical Cataracts through Scheimpflug Images: Agreement with the LOCS III Scale.
    Domínguez-Vicent A; Birkeldh U; Laurell CG; Nilson M; Brautaset R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149249. PubMed ID: 26890694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Iris color and cataract: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.
    Cumming RG; Mitchell P; Lim R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Aug; 130(2):237-8. PubMed ID: 11004303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suitability of slit lamp retroillumination photographs for classifying cataracts according to 'Lens Opacities Classification System II (LOCS II)'.
    Miglior S; Marighi PE; Orzalesi N
    Curr Eye Res; 1992 Oct; 11(10):971-9. PubMed ID: 1451528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lens opacities classification system II (LOCS II).
    Chylack LT; Leske MC; McCarthy D; Khu P; Kashiwagi T; Sperduto R
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1989 Jul; 107(7):991-7. PubMed ID: 2751471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strategies for measuring the rate of age-related cataract formation in vivo.
    Chylack LT; Leske MC; Khu P; McCarthy D; Wu SY
    Lens Eye Toxic Res; 1989; 6(4):515-22. PubMed ID: 2487269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation among lens opacities classification system III grading, visual function index-14, pentacam nucleus staging, and objective scatter index for cataract assessment.
    Pan AP; Wang QM; Huang F; Huang JH; Bao FJ; Yu AY
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Feb; 159(2):241-7.e2. PubMed ID: 25448993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comprehensive assessment of nuclear and cortical backscatter metrics derived from rotating Scheimpflug images.
    Ullrich K; Pesudovs K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Dec; 38(12):2100-7. PubMed ID: 23062740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cataract prevalence varies substantially with assessment systems: comparison of clinical and photographic grading in a population-based study.
    Tan AC; Wang JJ; Lamoureux EL; Wong W; Mitchell P; Li J; Tan AG; Wong TY
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2011 Aug; 18(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 21780875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.