These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9500645)

  • 21. [Guidelines for diagnosis and therapy of intraepithelial neoplasia and early invasive carcinoma of the female lower genital system (cervix uteri, vagina, vulva) established by the AGK (Colposcopy Work Group in the OGGG [Austrian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics])].
    Girardi F; Pickel H; Joura EA; Breitenecker G; Gitsch G; Graf AH; Neunteufel W
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2001; 41(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 11904476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical significance of the qualification of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: An analysis on the basis of histologic diagnoses.
    Vlahos NP; Dragisic KG; Wallach EE; Burroughs FH; Fluck S; Rosenthal DL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Apr; 182(4):885-90. PubMed ID: 10764467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Unilateral cervical cancer in a patient with cervix duplex.
    Kimball KJ; Rocconi RP; Straughn JM; Conner MG; Alvarez RD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Oct; 103(1):346-8. PubMed ID: 16857249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Role of Ancillary Techniques in Cervical Biopsy and Endocervical Curettage Specimens as Follow-Up to Papanicolaou Test Results Indicating a Diagnosis of Atypical Squamous Cells, Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, or High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion.
    Jenkins TM; Shojaei H; Song SJ; Schwartz LE
    Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(1-2):155-165. PubMed ID: 30982025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Histopathologic extent of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 lesions in the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion triage study: implications for subject safety and lead-time bias.
    Sherman ME; Wang SS; Tarone R; Rich L; Schiffman M
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 Apr; 12(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 12692113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Re: Have we resolved how to triage equivocal cervical cytology?
    Arbyn M; Dillner J; Van Ranst M; Buntinx F; Martin-Hirsch P; Paraskevaidis E
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Sep; 96(18):1401-2; author reply 1402. PubMed ID: 15367574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results.
    Shain AF; Kwok S; Folkins AK; Kong CS
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Jan; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29112019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL: a review of original vs. duplicate thin-layer slides.
    Quddus MR; Sung CJ; Eklund MJ; Zhang C; Steinhoff MM
    J Reprod Med; 2004 Jun; 49(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 15283054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with atypical squamous or glandular cells of undetermined significance cytology: a prospective study.
    Wensveen C; Kagie M; Veldhuizen R; De Groot C; Denny L; Zwinderman K; Trimbos B
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Sep; 82(9):883-9. PubMed ID: 12911453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cytologic features of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions involving endocervical glands on thin-layer cytology.
    Selvaggi SM
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(6):689-90. PubMed ID: 16450913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A, B & H isoantigens in cervical lesions.
    Bisht D; Misra V; Gupta SC; Mehrotra R; Garg S
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1998 Jan; 41(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 9581070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Cytologic predictive value for glandular involvement in high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    Mattośinho de Castro Ferraz Mda G; Focchi J; Stavale JN; Nicolau SM; Rodrigues de Lima G; Baracat EC
    Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 12685181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diverse glandular pathologies coexist with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in cyto-histological review of atypical glandular cells on ThinPrep specimens.
    Kumar N; Bongiovanni M; Molliet MJ; Pelte MF; Egger JF; Pache JC
    Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):351-8. PubMed ID: 18522633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Histology correlation with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) cytology diagnoses: An argument to ensure ASCUS follow-up that is as aggressive as that for LSIL.
    Dvorak KA; Finnemore M; Maksem JA
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Oct; 21(4):292-5. PubMed ID: 10495326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. ASCUS: comparative follow-up results related to previous SIL diagnosis.
    Alameda F; Fuste P; Conangla M; Gimferrer E; Soler I; Antorn MT; Persico S; Carreras R; Serrano S
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2000; 21(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 10726627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Results of a control quality strategy in cervical cytology.
    Gullo CE; Dami AL; Barbosa AP; Marques AM; Palmejani MA; de Lima LG; Bonilha JL
    Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2012; 10(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 23045833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Human papillomavirus (HPV) E6/E7 mRNA as a triage test after detection of HPV 16 and HPV 18 DNA.
    Perez Castro S; Iñarrea Fernández A; Lamas González MJ; Sarán Diez MT; Cid Lama A; Alvarez Martín MJ; Pato Mosquera M; López-Miragaya I; Estévez N; Torres Piñón J; Oña Navarro M
    J Med Virol; 2013 Jun; 85(6):1063-8. PubMed ID: 23588733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cervicography for triage of women with mildly abnormal cervical cytology results.
    Ferris DG; Schiffman M; Litaker MS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):939-43. PubMed ID: 11641682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.
    Lee JS; Kuan L; Oh S; Patten FW; Wilbur DC
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 9479344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Whole-Slide Imaging of Pap Cellblock Preparations Is a Potentially Valid Screening Method.
    Tawfik O; Davis M; Dillon S; Tawfik L; Diaz FJ; Amin K; Fan F
    Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 25967603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.