These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9501353)

  • 1. Risks and prevention of contamination of beef carcasses during the slaughter process in the United States of America.
    Galland JC
    Rev Sci Tech; 1997 Aug; 16(2):395-404. PubMed ID: 9501353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The risks and prevention of contamination of beef feedlot cattle: the perspective of the United States of America.
    Smith RA; Griffin DD; Dargatz DA
    Rev Sci Tech; 1997 Aug; 16(2):359-68. PubMed ID: 9501349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative distribution of Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli on beef carcasses and raw beef at retail establishments.
    Martínez-Chávez L; Cabrera-Diaz E; Pérez-Montaño JA; Garay-Martínez LE; Varela-Hernández JJ; Castillo A; Lucia L; Ávila-Novoa MG; Cardona-López MA; Gutiérrez-González P; Martínez-Gonzáles NE
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Oct; 210():149-55. PubMed ID: 26125489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Zero-tolerance for faecal contamination of carcasses as a tool in the control of O157 VTEC infections.
    Heuvelink AE; Roessink GL; Bosboom K; de Boer E
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2001 May; 66(1-2):13-20. PubMed ID: 11407542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microbial pathogen control in the beef chain: recent research advances.
    Buncic S; Nychas GJ; Lee MR; Koutsoumanis K; Hébraud M; Desvaux M; Chorianopoulos N; Bolton D; Blagojevic B; Antic D
    Meat Sci; 2014 Jul; 97(3):288-97. PubMed ID: 23688797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrating microbial decontamination with organic acids in HACCP programmes for muscle foods: prospects and controversies.
    Smulders FJ; Greer GG
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 44(3):149-69. PubMed ID: 9851597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hazard analysis and critical control point systems in the United States Department of Agriculture regulatory policy.
    Billy TJ; Wachsmuth IK
    Rev Sci Tech; 1997 Aug; 16(2):342-8. PubMed ID: 9501347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analysis on the effect of interventions used in cattle processing plants to reduce Escherichia coli contamination.
    Zhilyaev S; Cadavez V; Gonzales-Barron U; Phetxumphou K; Gallagher D
    Food Res Int; 2017 Mar; 93():16-25. PubMed ID: 28290276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of antimicrobial agents in official abattoirs under meat inspection in the United States of America.
    Patch MA
    Rev Sci Tech; 1995 Jun; 14(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 7579633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microbial populations on animal hides and beef carcasses at different stages of slaughter in plants employing multiple-sequential interventions for decontamination.
    Bacon RT; Belk KE; Sofos JN; Clayton RP; Reagan JO; Smith GC
    J Food Prot; 2000 Aug; 63(8):1080-6. PubMed ID: 10945584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Washing and chilling as critical control points in pork slaughter hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) systems.
    Bolton DJ; Pearce RA; Sheridan JJ; Blair IS; McDowell DA; Harrington D
    J Appl Microbiol; 2002; 92(5):893-902. PubMed ID: 11972694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of hygienic treatments during slaughtering on microbial dynamics and contamination of sheep meat.
    Omer MK; Hauge SJ; Østensvik Ø; Moen B; Alvseike O; Røtterud OJ; Prieto M; Dommersnes S; Nesteng OH; Nesbakken T
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Feb; 194():7-14. PubMed ID: 25461602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visible contamination on animals and carcasses and the microbiological condition of meat.
    Gill CO
    J Food Prot; 2004 Feb; 67(2):413-9. PubMed ID: 14968981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Guaranteed safe meat?
    Vogel LP
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1995 Feb; 206(4):432-3. PubMed ID: 7632245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intensive (pasture) beef cattle operations: the perspective of New Zealand.
    Hathaway SC
    Rev Sci Tech; 1997 Aug; 16(2):382-90. PubMed ID: 9501351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microbiological contamination of cattle carcasses at different stages of slaughter in two abattoirs.
    Zweifel C; Capek M; Stephan R
    Meat Sci; 2014 Oct; 98(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 24967539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance Metrics for Slaughter and Dressing Hygiene at Australian Beef Export Establishments.
    Horchner P; Huynh L; Sumner J; Vanderlinde PB; Jenson I
    J Food Prot; 2020 Jun; 83(6):996-1001. PubMed ID: 32034401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The significance of clean and dirty animals for bacterial dynamics along the beef chain.
    Hauge SJ; Nesbakken T; Moen B; Røtterud OJ; Dommersnes S; Nesteng O; Østensvik Ø; Alvseike O
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Dec; 214():70-76. PubMed ID: 26248068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of Salmonella control performance in U.S. young chicken slaughter and pork slaughter establishments.
    Muth MK; Fahimi M; Karns SA
    J Food Prot; 2009 Jan; 72(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 19205457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of slaughterhouse and day of sample on the probability of a pig carcass being Salmonella-positive according to the Enterobacteriaceae count in the largest Brazilian pork production region.
    Corbellini LG; Júnior AB; de Freitas Costa E; Duarte AS; Albuquerque ER; Kich JD; Cardoso M; Nauta M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2016 Jul; 228():58-66. PubMed ID: 27107299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.