BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9501494)

  • 61. Comparison of Boolean analysis and standard phylogenetic methods using artificially evolved and natural mt-tRNA sequences from great apes.
    Ari E; Ittzés P; Podani J; Thi QC; Jakó E
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Apr; 63(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 22289866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Likelihood-Based Tests of Species Tree Hypotheses.
    Adams R; DeGiorgio M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2023 Jul; 40(7):. PubMed ID: 37440530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A topological transformation in evolutionary tree search methods based on maximum likelihood combining p-ECR and neighbor joining.
    Guo MZ; Li JF; Liu Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 9 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S4. PubMed ID: 18541057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Uncovering hidden phylogenetic consensus in large data sets.
    Pattengale ND; Aberer AJ; Swenson KM; Stamatakis A; Moret BM
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(4):902-11. PubMed ID: 21301032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Efficiencies of maximum likelihood methods of phylogenetic inferences when different substitution models are used.
    Piontkivska H
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2004 Jun; 31(3):865-73. PubMed ID: 15120384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design.
    McCormack JE; Huang H; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 20525604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. PALM: a paralleled and integrated framework for phylogenetic inference with automatic likelihood model selectors.
    Chen SH; Su SY; Lo CZ; Chen KH; Huang TJ; Kuo BH; Lin CY
    PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e8116. PubMed ID: 19997614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Analytic solutions of maximum likelihood on forks of four taxa.
    Chor B; Snir S
    Math Biosci; 2007 Aug; 208(2):347-58. PubMed ID: 17664091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Phylogenetic placement of metagenomic reads using the minimum evolution principle.
    Filipski A; Tamura K; Billing-Ross P; Murillo O; Kumar S
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S13. PubMed ID: 25923672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Optimizing taxon addition order and branch lengths in the construction of phylogenetic trees using maximum likelihood.
    Yoon Y; Kim YH
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2020 Apr; 18(2):2050003. PubMed ID: 32372712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Parsimony analysis of phylogenomic datasets (II): evaluation of PAUP*, MEGA and MPBoot.
    Goloboff PA; Catalano SA; Torres A
    Cladistics; 2022 Feb; 38(1):126-146. PubMed ID: 35049082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Relaxed neighbor joining: a fast distance-based phylogenetic tree construction method.
    Evans J; Sheneman L; Foster J
    J Mol Evol; 2006 Jun; 62(6):785-92. PubMed ID: 16752216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Using max cut to enhance rooted trees consistency.
    Snir S; Rao S
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2006; 3(4):323-33. PubMed ID: 17085842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Hessian calculation for phylogenetic likelihood based on the pruning algorithm and its applications.
    Kenney T; Gu H
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Sep; 11(4):Article 14. PubMed ID: 23023698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Phylogenetic and Evolutionary Analysis of Plant ARGONAUTES.
    Singh RK; Pandey SP
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1640():267-294. PubMed ID: 28608350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Characterizing Local Optima for Maximum Parsimony.
    Urheim E; Ford E; St John K
    Bull Math Biol; 2016 May; 78(5):1058-75. PubMed ID: 27234257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. constNJ: an algorithm to reconstruct sets of phylogenetic trees satisfying pairwise topological constraints.
    Matsen FA
    J Comput Biol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):799-818. PubMed ID: 20500096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
    Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Quartets MaxCut: a divide and conquer quartets algorithm.
    Snir S; Rao S
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2010; 7(4):704-18. PubMed ID: 21030737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The K tree score: quantification of differences in the relative branch length and topology of phylogenetic trees.
    Soria-Carrasco V; Talavera G; Igea J; Castresana J
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Nov; 23(21):2954-6. PubMed ID: 17890735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.