120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9502027)
1. Pilot study of a unique film dressing for the treatment of donor site wounds.
Himel HN; Ratliff CR; Baruch LD; Rodeheaver GT
J Burn Care Rehabil; 1998; 19(1 Pt 1):62-5. PubMed ID: 9502027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of an oxygen-diffusion dressing for accelerated healing of donor-site wounds.
Lairet KF; Baer D; Leas ML; Renz EM; Cancio LC
J Burn Care Res; 2014; 35(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 23877142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective comparison of a new, synthetic donor site dressing versus an impregnated gauze dressing.
Hickerson WL; Kealey GP; Smith DJ; Thomson PD
J Burn Care Rehabil; 1994; 15(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 7929519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of donor-site healing under Xeroform and Jelonet dressings: unexpected findings.
Malpass KG; Snelling CF; Tron V
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Aug; 112(2):430-9. PubMed ID: 12900600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Unna "cap" as a scalp donor site dressing.
Summer GJ; Hansen FL; Costa BA; Engrav LH; Sharar SR
J Burn Care Rehabil; 1999; 20(2):183-8, discussion 182. PubMed ID: 10188118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Management of skin-grafted burn wounds with Xeroform and layers of dry coarse-mesh gauze dressing results in excellent graft take and minimal nursing time.
Hansbrough W; Doré C; Hansbrough JF
J Burn Care Rehabil; 1995; 16(5):531-4. PubMed ID: 8537426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Aquacel Ag for Autogenous Skin Donor Sites.
Haith LR; Stair-Buchmann ME; Ackerman BH; Herder D; Reigart CL; Stoering M; Guilday RE; Patton ML; Ross KM
J Burn Care Res; 2015; 36(6):602-6. PubMed ID: 25501785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Split-thickness skin graft donor site management. A randomized prospective trial comparing a hydrophilic polyurethane absorbent foam dressing with a petrolatum gauze dressing.
Weber RS; Hankins P; Limitone E; Callender D; Frankenthaler RM; Wolf P; Goepfert H
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1995 Oct; 121(10):1145-9. PubMed ID: 7546582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of Xeroform and SkinTemp dressings in the healing of skin graft donor sites.
Griswold JA; Cepica T; Rossi L; Wimmer JS; Merrifield HH; Hester C; Sauter T; Baker CR
J Burn Care Rehabil; 1995; 16(2 Pt 1):136-40. PubMed ID: 7775507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The ideal split-thickness skin graft donor-site dressing: a clinical comparative trial of a modified polyurethane dressing and aquacel.
Dornseifer U; Lonic D; Gerstung TI; Herter F; Fichter AM; Holm C; Schuster T; Ninkovic M
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Oct; 128(4):918-924. PubMed ID: 21681125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of skin graft donor site management using oxidised regenerated cellulose (ORC)/collagen/silver-ORC with absorptive silicone adhesive border and transparent film dressing vs semi-occlusive dressings.
Chowdhry SA
Int Wound J; 2023 Apr; 20(4):1112-1117. PubMed ID: 36151766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of Dressing Materials on Donor Site Morbidity: A Comparative Study at a Tertiary Hospital in Kenya.
Macharia M; Nangole FW
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jul; 83(1):22-25. PubMed ID: 31194707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective trial comparing Biobrane, Duoderm and xeroform for skin graft donor sites.
Feldman DL; Rogers A; Karpinski RH
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Jul; 173(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 1907769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of modern dressings in managing split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a single-centre randomised controlled trial.
Kazanavičius M; Cepas A; Kolaityte V; Simoliuniene R; Rimdeika R
J Wound Care; 2017 Jun; 26(6):281-291. PubMed ID: 28598760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of povidone-iodine foam dressing (Betafoam), hydrocellular foam dressing (Allevyn), and petrolatum gauze for split-thickness skin graft donor site dressing.
Pak CS; Park DH; Oh TS; Lee WJ; Jun YJ; Lee KA; Oh KS; Kwak KH; Rhie JW
Int Wound J; 2019 Apr; 16(2):379-386. PubMed ID: 30479060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized comparison study of Aquacel Ag and Glucan II as donor site dressings with regard to healing time, cosmesis, infection rate, and patient's perceived pain: a pilot study.
Bailey S; Carmean M; Cinat M; Burton K; Lane C; Malinoski D
J Burn Care Res; 2011; 32(6):627-32. PubMed ID: 21844815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of a novel chitosan-based dressing on split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a pilot study.
Varon DE; Smith JD; Bharadia DR; Shafique N; Sakthivel D; Halvorson EG; Nuutila K; Sinha I
J Wound Care; 2018 Jul; 27(Sup7):S12-S18. PubMed ID: 30008255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Suprathel, a new skin substitute, in the management of donor sites of split-thickness skin grafts: results of a clinical study.
Schwarze H; Küntscher M; Uhlig C; Hierlemann H; Prantl L; Noack N; Hartmann B
Burns; 2007 Nov; 33(7):850-4. PubMed ID: 17493762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of silver coated dressings on donor site wounds: a prospective, controlled matched pair study.
Innes ME; Umraw N; Fish JS; Gomez M; Cartotto RC
Burns; 2001 Sep; 27(6):621-7. PubMed ID: 11525858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized clinical trial of donor-site wound dressings after split-skin grafting.
Brölmann FE; Eskes AM; Goslings JC; Niessen FB; de Bree R; Vahl AC; Pierik EG; Vermeulen H; Ubbink DT;
Br J Surg; 2013 Apr; 100(5):619-27. PubMed ID: 23460253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
