These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9502127)

  • 21. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Adsorption of parotid saliva proteins and adhesion of Streptococcus mutans ATCC 21752 to dental fiber-reinforced composites.
    Tanner J; Carlén A; Söderling E; Vallittu PK
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2003 Jul; 66(1):391-8. PubMed ID: 12808599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of fluoride-releasing restorative materials on bacteria-induced pH fall at the bacteria-material interface: an in vitro model study.
    Mayanagi G; Igarashi K; Washio J; Domon-Tawaraya H; Takahashi N
    J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 24246685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins.
    Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Roles of salivary proteins in the adherence of oral streptococci to various orthodontic brackets.
    Ahn SJ; Kho HS; Lee SW; Nahm DS
    J Dent Res; 2002 Jun; 81(6):411-5. PubMed ID: 12097434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Preferential affinity of oral bacteria for homologous salivary films on dental materials.
    Orstavik J; Orstavik D; Kommisar J
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1982; 40(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 6950646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surface characteristics of orthodontic adhesives and effects on streptococcal adhesion.
    Ahn SJ; Lim BS; Lee SJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):489-95; discussion 13A. PubMed ID: 20362908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of three bleaching agents on the surface properties of three different esthetic restorative materials.
    Turker SB; Biskin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):466-73. PubMed ID: 12806324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biodegradation of resin-dentin interfaces is dependent on the restorative material, mode of adhesion, esterase or MMP inhibition.
    Huang B; Cvitkovitch DG; Santerre JP; Finer Y
    Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 29789163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sealing capacity of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and resin composite placed in vivo in Class 5 restorations.
    Ferrari M; Davidson CL
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 8957921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of two prophylaxis methods on adherence of Streptococcus mutans to microfilled composite resin and giomer surfaces.
    Kimyai S; Lotfipour F; Pourabbas R; Sadr A; Nikazar S; Milani M
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2011 Jul; 16(4):e561-7. PubMed ID: 20711117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An in vitro microleakage study of the 'bonded-base' restorative technique.
    Yap AU; Mok BY; Pearson G
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Mar; 24(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 9131479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effects of surface roughness of composite resin on biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans in the presence of saliva.
    Park JW; Song CW; Jung JH; Ahn SJ; Ferracane JL
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):532-9. PubMed ID: 22339385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Antimicrobial abilities of various dentine bonding agents and restorative materials.
    Palenik CJ; Setcos JC
    J Dent; 1996 Jul; 24(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 8783535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In situ effects of restorative materials on dental biofilm and enamel demineralisation.
    Sousa RP; Zanin IC; Lima JP; Vasconcelos SM; Melo MA; Beltrão HC; Rodrigues LK
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19026481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Streptococcal adherence to uncoated and saliva-coated restoratives.
    Satou J; Fukunaga A; Morikawa A; Matsumae I; Satou N; Shintani H
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Sep; 18(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 1839312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Saliva-promoted adhesion of Streptococcus mutans MT8148 associates with dental plaque and caries experience.
    Shimotoyodome A; Kobayashi H; Tokimitsu I; Hase T; Inoue T; Matsukubo T; Takaesu Y
    Caries Res; 2007; 41(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 17426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Natural saliva as an adjuvant in a secondary caries model based on Streptococcus mutans.
    Hetrodt F; Lausch J; Meyer-Lueckel H; Apel C; Conrads G
    Arch Oral Biol; 2018 Jun; 90():138-143. PubMed ID: 29614462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesion on composite resin surfaces after different finishing and polishing techniques.
    Pereira CA; Eskelson E; Cavalli V; Liporoni PC; Jorge AO; do Rego MA
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 21740238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.