These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9503375)

  • 1. The need for individualized dosimetry for tangential breast treatment.
    Dunlap B; Olch A; Wollin M; Kagan AR
    Med Dosim; 1997; 22(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 9503375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comprehensive clinical 3-dimensional dosimetric analysis of forward planned IMRT and conventional wedge planned techniques for intact breast radiotherapy.
    Herrick JS; Neill CJ; Rosser PF
    Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 18262125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the homogeneity of breast dose distributions with and without the medial wedge.
    Ikner CL; Russo R; Podgorsak MB; Proulx GM; Lee RJ
    Med Dosim; 1998; 23(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 9664273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intensity modulation to improve dose uniformity with tangential breast radiotherapy: initial clinical experience.
    Kestin LL; Sharpe MB; Frazier RC; Vicini FA; Yan D; Matter RC; Martinez AA; Wong JW
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Dec; 48(5):1559-68. PubMed ID: 11121662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy.
    Yu CX; Li XA; Ma L; Chen D; Naqvi S; Shepard D; Sarfaraz M; Holmes TW; Suntharalingam M; Mansfield CM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):453-63. PubMed ID: 12023150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dosimetric comparison of treatment planning systems in irradiation of breast with tangential fields.
    Cheng CW; Das IJ; Tang W; Chang S; Tsai JS; Ceberg C; De Gaspie B; Singh R; Fein DA; Fowble B
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jul; 38(4):835-42. PubMed ID: 9240653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Irradiation planning in conservative treatment of cancer of the breast (author's transl)].
    Schrader R; Würthner K; Schrader D
    Strahlentherapie; 1981 Jul; 157(7):455-61. PubMed ID: 7268816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intensity-modulated tangential beam irradiation of the intact breast.
    Hong L; Hunt M; Chui C; Spirou S; Forster K; Lee H; Yahalom J; Kutcher GJ; McCormick B
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jul; 44(5):1155-64. PubMed ID: 10421550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dosimetric analysis of intact breast irradiation in off-axis planes.
    Buchholz TA; Gurgoze E; Bice WS; Prestidge BR
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Aug; 39(1):261-7. PubMed ID: 9300762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of the normalized prescription isodose line on the magnitude of Monte Carlo vs. pencil beam target dose differences for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.
    Zheng D; Zhang Q; Liang X; Zhu X; Verma V; Wang S; Zhou S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):48-58. PubMed ID: 27455476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of superficial dosimetry between treatment planning system and measurement for several breast cancer treatment techniques.
    Akino Y; Das IJ; Bartlett GK; Zhang H; Thompson E; Zook JE
    Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011714. PubMed ID: 23298084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of lung density corrections on treatment planning for primary breast cancer.
    Fraass BA; Lichter AS; McShan DL; Yanke BR; Diaz RF; Yeakel KS; van de Geijn J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1988 Jan; 14(1):179-90. PubMed ID: 3335452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of 3D conformal breast radiation treatment plans using the anisotropic analytical algorithm and pencil beam convolution algorithm.
    Yoo S; Wu Q; O'Daniel J; Horton J; Yin FF
    Radiother Oncol; 2012 May; 103(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 22349127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
    Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A single isocenter technique using CT-based planning in the treatment of breast cancer.
    Edlund T; Gannett D
    Med Dosim; 1999; 24(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 10643732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated tangential beam irradiation for breast cancer.
    Li JS; Freedman GM; Price R; Wang L; Anderson P; Chen L; Xiong W; Yang J; Pollack A; Ma CM
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1023-31. PubMed ID: 15191288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design and fabrication of a half-beam wedge for treatment of breast patients.
    Radice VL; Turner JM; Kurup R; Kiefer E; Jones D
    Med Dosim; 2000; 25(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 11150691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of an Effective Wedge Angle by Combination of Two Arbitrary Universal Wedge Fields in Radiation Therapy of Cancer Patients with Megavoltage Photon Beams.
    Shamsi A; Tahmasebi Birgani MJ; Behrooz MA; Arvandi S; Fatahiasl J; Maskny R; Abdalvand N
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(1):197-200. PubMed ID: 26838209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survey of tangential field planning and dose distribution in the UK: background to the introduction of the quality assurance programme for the START trial in early breast cancer.
    Winfield EA; Deighton A; Venables K; Hoskin PJ; Aird EG;
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 76(904):254-9. PubMed ID: 12711645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Various wedge isodose angles for treatment planning.
    Saw CB; Pawlicki T; Wu A
    Med Dosim; 1992; 17(4):181-5. PubMed ID: 1485904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.