These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9503375)
21. Breast dosimetry in transverse and longitudinal field MRI-Linac radiotherapy systems. Mahdavi SR; Esmaeeli AD; Pouladian M; Monfared AS; Sardari D; Bagheri S Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):925-36. PubMed ID: 25652505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. What is the optimum breast plan: a study based on the START trial plans. Venables K; Miles EA; Aird EG; Hoskin PJ Br J Radiol; 2006 Sep; 79(945):734-9. PubMed ID: 16940374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Potential clinical efficacy of intensity-modulated conformal therapy. Meeks SL; Buatti JM; Bova FJ; Friedman WA; Mendenhall WM; Zlotecki RA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jan; 40(2):483-95. PubMed ID: 9457839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical experience with EPID dosimetry for prostate IMRT pre-treatment dose verification. McDermott LN; Wendling M; van Asselen B; Stroom J; Sonke JJ; van Herk M; Mijnheer BJ Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3921-30. PubMed ID: 17089854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Utility of three-dimensional planning for axillary node coverage with breast-conserving radiation therapy: early experience. Smitt MC; Goffinet DR Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 9885612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Performance evaluation of field-in-field technique for tangential breast irradiation. Lee JW; Hong S; Choi KS; Kim YL; Park BM; Chung JB; Lee DH; Suh TS Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2008 Feb; 38(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 18216025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Breast Radiotherapy with Mixed Energy Photons; a Model for Optimal Beam Weighting. Birgani MT; Fatahiasl J; Hosseini SM; Bagheri A; Behrooz MA; Zabiehzadeh M; Meskani R; Gomari MT Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(17):7785-8. PubMed ID: 26625798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Dosimetric evaluation of intensity-modulated tangential beam versus conventional tangential irradiation for breast cancer]. Huang XB; Jiang GL; Chen JY; Chen LF; Hu WG Ai Zheng; 2006 Jul; 25(7):855-60. PubMed ID: 16831277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dose to the contralateral breast: a comparison of two techniques using the enhanced dynamic wedge versus a standard wedge. Warlick WB; O'Rear JH; Earley L; Moeller JH; Gaffney DK; Leavitt DD Med Dosim; 1997; 22(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 9307948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Direct aperture optimization of breast IMRT and the dosimetric impact of respiration motion. Zhang G; Jiang Z; Shepard D; Zhang B; Yu C Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):N357-69. PubMed ID: 17019024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dosimetric improvements following 3D planning of tangential breast irradiation. Aref A; Thornton D; Youssef E; He T; Tekyi-Mensah S; Denton L; Ezzell G Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Dec; 48(5):1569-74. PubMed ID: 11121663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Improved dose distribution with a universal acrylic breast compensator. Johnson JM; Potish RA; Khan FM Med Dosim; 1996; 21(3):127-32. PubMed ID: 8899675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of optimal treatment planning for radiotherapy of synchronous bilateral breast cancer including regional lymph node irradiation. Cho Y; Cho YJ; Chang WS; Kim JW; Choi WH; Lee IJ Radiat Oncol; 2019 Apr; 14(1):56. PubMed ID: 30935400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Improvement in tangential breast planning efficiency using a knowledge-based expert system. Wells DM; Walrath D; Craighead PS Med Dosim; 2000; 25(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 11025259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Three-dimensional dose distribution of tangential breast irradiation: results of a multicentre phantom dosimetry study. Delaney G; Beckham W; Veness M; Ahern V; Back M; Boyages J; Fox C; Graham P; Jacob G; Lonergan D; Morgan G; Pendlebury S; Yuile P Radiother Oncol; 2000 Oct; 57(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 11033190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. SU-E-T-440: Dosimetry Parameter Comparison between Field-In-Field Technique and Conventional Physical Wedge Technique for Whole Breast Radiation Treatment. Su M; Ayzenberg V; Li W Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part16):3806. PubMed ID: 28517232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparative dosimetric study on tangential photon beams, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and modulated electron radiotherapy (MERT) for breast cancer treatment. Ma CM; Ding M; Li JS; Lee MC; Pawlicki T; Deng J Phys Med Biol; 2003 Apr; 48(7):909-24. PubMed ID: 12701895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of lung-density correction in treatment planning for tangential-fields breast irradiation: a case report. Kuchnir FT; Van Huis JM; Pelizzari CA Med Dosim; 1989; 14(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 2765122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dose to contralateral breast: a comparison of four primary breast irradiation techniques. Kelly CA; Wang XY; Chu JC; Hartsell WF Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Feb; 34(3):727-32. PubMed ID: 8621298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Contralateral breast dose after whole-breast irradiation: an analysis by treatment technique. Williams TM; Moran JM; Hsu SH; Marsh R; Yanke B; Fraass BA; Pierce LJ Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Apr; 82(5):2079-85. PubMed ID: 21489713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]