These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9504484)

  • 1. MR angiographic and sonographic indications for endarterectomy.
    Huston J; Nichols DA; Luetmer PH; Rydberg CH; Lewis BD; Meyer FB; Brown RD; Schleck CD
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1998 Feb; 19(2):309-15. PubMed ID: 9504484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery disease.
    Serfaty JM; Chirossel P; Chevallier JM; Ecochard R; Froment JC; Douek PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Aug; 175(2):455-63. PubMed ID: 10915694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Alvarez-Linera J; Benito-León J; Escribano J; Campollo J; Gesto R
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 May; 24(5):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12748115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time-of-flight MR angiography of carotid artery stenosis: does a flow void represent severe stenosis?
    Nederkoorn PJ; van der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; van der Lugt A; Bartels LW; Mali WP
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2002; 23(10):1779-84. PubMed ID: 12427639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in predicting angiographic stenosis of the internal carotid artery: linear regression analysis.
    Hathout GM; Duh MJ; El-Saden SM
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 Oct; 24(9):1747-56. PubMed ID: 14561597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.
    De Marco JK; Nesbit GM; Wesbey GE; Richardson D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy.
    Back MR; Wilson JS; Rushing G; Stordahl N; Linden C; Johnson BL; Bandyk DF
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 10957649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wall Shear Stress and T1 Contrast Ratio Are Associated With Embolic Signals During Carotid Exposure in Endarterectomy.
    Oshida S; Mori F; Sasaki M; Sato Y; Kobayshi M; Yoshida K; Fujiwara S; Ogasawara K
    Stroke; 2018 Sep; 49(9):2061-2066. PubMed ID: 30354998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Carotid endarterectomy: preoperative evaluation of candidates with combined Doppler sonography and MR angiography. Work in progress.
    Polak JF; Kalina P; Donaldson MC; O'Leary DH; Whittemore AD; Mannick JA
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 8421730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sonographic NASCET index: a new doppler parameter for assessment of internal carotid artery stenosis.
    Hathout GM; Fink JR; El-Saden SM; Grant EG
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2005 Jan; 26(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15661704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy of MR phase-contrast flow quantification as an adjunct to MR angiography.
    Vanninen RL; Manninen HI; Partanen PL; Vainio PA; Soimakallio S
    Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):459-67. PubMed ID: 7824727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical decisions on the basis of magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries.
    Anson JA; Heiserman JE; Drayer BP; Spetzler RF
    Neurosurgery; 1993 Mar; 32(3):335-43; discussion 343. PubMed ID: 8455757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Segmented three-dimensional echo-planar flow imaging of the cervical carotid arteries.
    Tkach JA; Ding X; Ruggieri PM; Obuchowski NA; Lieber M; Masaryk TJ
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1997 Aug; 18(7):1339-47. PubMed ID: 9282867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of carotid endarterectomy on primary collateral blood flow in patients with severe carotid artery lesions.
    Hendrikse J; Rutgers DR; Klijn CJ; Eikelboom BC; van der Grond J
    Stroke; 2003 Jul; 34(7):1650-4. PubMed ID: 12775888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reappraisal of duplex criteria to assess significant carotid stenosis with special reference to reports from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial and the European Carotid Surgery Trial.
    Neale ML; Chambers JL; Kelly AT; Connard S; Lawton MA; Roche J; Appleberg M
    J Vasc Surg; 1994 Oct; 20(4):642-9. PubMed ID: 7933267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography?
    Patel MR; Kuntz KM; Klufas RA; Kim D; Kramer J; Polak JF; Skillman JJ; Whittemore AD; Edelman RR; Kent KC
    Stroke; 1995 Oct; 26(10):1753-8. PubMed ID: 7570720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Carotid artery: prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography with conventional angiography and duplex US.
    Huston J; Lewis BD; Wiebers DO; Meyer FB; Riederer SJ; Weaver AL
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 8421731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography--preliminary study.
    Remonda L; Heid O; Schroth G
    Radiology; 1998 Oct; 209(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 9769818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noninvasive evaluation of collateral blood flow through circle of Willis in cervical carotid stenosis using selective magnetic resonance angiography.
    Ito K; Sasaki M; Kobayashi M; Ogasawara K; Nishihara T; Takahashi T; Natori T; Uwano I; Yamashita F; Kudo K
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014; 23(5):1019-23. PubMed ID: 24103664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross-sectional magnetic resonance angiography is accurate in predicting degree of carotid stenosis.
    Morasch MD; Gurjala AN; Washington E; Chiou AC; Simonetti OP; Finn JP; Yao JS
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2002 May; 16(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 11957000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.