These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 950449)
1. Effects of age and frequency of stimulus repetitions on two-choice reaction time. Fozard JL; Thomas JC; Waugh NC J Gerontol; 1976 Sep; 31(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 950449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Expectancy for events in old age: stimulus sequence effects on P300 and reaction time. Ford JM; Duncan-Johnson CC; Pfefferbaum A; Kopell BS J Gerontol; 1982 Nov; 37(6):696-704. PubMed ID: 7130643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adaptive History Biases Result from Confidence-Weighted Accumulation of past Choices. Braun A; Urai AE; Donner TH J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(10):2418-2429. PubMed ID: 29371318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Age-related differences in serial binary classification. Waugh NC; Fozrad JL; Thomas JC Exp Aging Res; 1978 Oct; 4(5):433-41. PubMed ID: 738321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Task intentions and their implementation into actions: cognitive control from adolescence to middle adulthood. Poljac E; Haartsen R; van der Cruijsen R; Kiesel A; Poljac E Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):215-229. PubMed ID: 29026993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inconsistency in reaction time across the life span. Williams BR; Hultsch DF; Strauss EH; Hunter MA; Tannock R Neuropsychology; 2005 Jan; 19(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 15656766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural processing in a three-choice reaction-time task: a study using cerebral evoked-potentials and single-trial analysis in normal humans. Ortiz TA; Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ J Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 69(5):1499-512. PubMed ID: 8509828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sequential effects and sequence learning in a three-choice serial reaction time task. Lee JC; Beesley T; Livesey EJ Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Oct; 170():168-76. PubMed ID: 27518835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The contribution of stimulus frequency and recency to set-size effects. van 't Wout F Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1123-1128. PubMed ID: 29209942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inconsistency in serial choice decision and motor reaction times dissociate in younger and older adults. Bunce D; MacDonald SW; Hultsch DF Brain Cogn; 2004 Dec; 56(3):320-7. PubMed ID: 15522770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Age differences in voluntary task switching. Butler KM; Weywadt C Psychol Aging; 2013 Dec; 28(4):1024-31. PubMed ID: 24364405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Response compatibility and the relationship between event-related potentials and the timing of a motor response. Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Chequer RS; Ortiz TA J Neurophysiol; 1996 Dec; 76(6):3705-13. PubMed ID: 8985868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Keeping Simon simple: examining the relationship between sequential modulations and feature repetitions with two stimuli, two locations and two responses. Hazeltine E; Akçay C; Mordkoff JT Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Feb; 136(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 20708162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perception of categories: from coding efficiency to reaction times. Bonnasse-Gahot L; Nadal JP Brain Res; 2012 Jan; 1434():47-61. PubMed ID: 21920507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of directional response variables on eye-hand reaction times and decision time. Jacobson JM; Repperger DW; Goodyear C; Michel N Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Feb; 62(1):195-208. PubMed ID: 3960661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of aging on slowing of motor-response generation. Falkenstein M; Yordanova J; Kolev V Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 16257076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]