864 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9507921)
1. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by general practitioners: ophthalmoscopy or retinal photography as 35 mm colour transparencies?
Owens DR; Gibbins RL; Lewis PA; Wall S; Allen JC; Morton R
Diabet Med; 1998 Feb; 15(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 9507921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Practical application of the European Field Guide in screening for diabetic retinopathy by using ophthalmoscopy and 35 mm retinal slides.
Gibbins RL; Owens DR; Allen JC; Eastman L
Diabetologia; 1998 Jan; 41(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 9498631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in a clinical setting: a comparison of direct ophthalmoscopy by primary care physicians with fundus photography.
Griffith SP; Freeman WL; Shaw CJ; Mitchell WH; Olden CR; Figgs LD; Kinyoun JL; Underwood DL; Will JC
J Fam Pract; 1993 Jul; 37(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 8345340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening for sight threatening diabetic retinopathy using non-mydriatic retinal camera in a primary care setting: to dilate or not to dilate?
Baeza M; Orozco-Beltrán D; Gil-Guillen VF; Pedrera V; Ribera MC; Pertusa S; Merino J
Int J Clin Pract; 2009 Mar; 63(3):433-8. PubMed ID: 19222628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: the utility of nonmydriatic retinal photography in Egyptian adults.
Penman AD; Saaddine JB; Hegazy M; Sous ES; Ali MA; Brechner RJ; Herman WH; Engelgau MM; Klein R
Diabet Med; 1998 Sep; 15(9):783-7. PubMed ID: 9737809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal imaging for screening diabetic retinopathy.
Lopez-Bastida J; Cabrera-Lopez F; Serrano-Aguilar P
Diabet Med; 2007 Apr; 24(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 17298591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can digitised colour 35 mm transparencies be used to diagnose diabetic retinopathy?
George LD; Leverton C; Young S; Lusty J; Dunstan FD; Owens DR
Diabet Med; 1997 Nov; 14(11):970-3. PubMed ID: 9400922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy: comparison of fundus photography with automated color contrast threshold test.
Ong GL; Ripley LG; Newsom RS; Cooper M; Casswell AG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 15013866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.
Chow SP; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Katalinic P; Hock K; Tolson A; Kirby R; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of direct ophthalmoscopy for detection of diabetic retinopathy using fundus photographs as a reference standard.
Ahsan S; Basit A; Ahmed KR; Ali L; Shaheen F; Ulhaque MS; Fawwad A
Diabetes Metab Syndr; 2014; 8(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 24907174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal images in grading diabetic retinopathy.
Saari JM; Summanen P; Kivelä T; Saari KM
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Apr; 82(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 15043527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of digital retinal images and 35 mm colour transparencies in detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy.
George LD; Halliwell M; Hill R; Aldington SJ; Lusty J; Dunstan F; Owens DR
Diabet Med; 1998 Mar; 15(3):250-3. PubMed ID: 9545127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening for diabetic retinopathy--comparison of a nurse and a doctor with retinal photography.
Forrest RD; Jackson CA; Yudkin JS
Diabetes Res; 1987 May; 5(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 3621804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photographs for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy.
Kinyoun JL; Martin DC; Fujimoto WY; Leonetti DL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 May; 33(6):1888-93. PubMed ID: 1582794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. OPHDIAT: a telemedical network screening system for diabetic retinopathy in the Ile-de-France.
Massin P; Chabouis A; Erginay A; Viens-Bitker C; Lecleire-Collet A; Meas T; Guillausseau PJ; Choupot G; André B; Denormandie P
Diabetes Metab; 2008 Jun; 34(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 18468470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diabetic retinopathy screening in general practice: a pilot study.
Askew D; Schluter PJ; Spurling G; Maher CM; Cranstoun P; Kennedy C; Jackson C
Aust Fam Physician; 2009 Aug; 38(8):650-6. PubMed ID: 19893789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography.
Aptel F; Denis P; Rouberol F; Thivolet C
Diabetes Metab; 2008 Jun; 34(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18406188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retinopathy screening in type 2 diabetes: reliability of wide angle fundus photography.
de Sonnaville JJ; van der Feltz van der Sloot D; Ernst L; Wijkel D; Heine RJ
Diabet Med; 1996 May; 13(5):482-6. PubMed ID: 8737032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
