These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9508024)

  • 1. Effects of bilateral olivocochlear lesions on vowel formant discrimination in cats.
    Hienz RD; Stiles P; May BJ
    Hear Res; 1998 Feb; 116(1-2):10-20. PubMed ID: 9508024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2519-32. PubMed ID: 8120596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functioning of olivocochlear bundle and speech perception in noise.
    Kumar UA; Vanaja CS
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 15064659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protection from acoustic trauma is not a primary function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system.
    Christopher Kirk E; Smith DW
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2003 Dec; 4(4):445-65. PubMed ID: 12784134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Behavioral studies of the olivocochlear efferent system: learning to listen in noise.
    May BJ; Budelis J; Niparko JK
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 15148194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Right-ear advantage drives the link between olivocochlear efferent 'antimasking' and speech-in-noise listening benefits.
    Bidelman GM; Bhagat SP
    Neuroreport; 2015 May; 26(8):483-7. PubMed ID: 25919996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychophysical correlates of contralateral efferent suppression. I. The role of the medial olivocochlear system in "central masking" in nonhuman primates.
    Smith DW; Turner DA; Henson MM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):933-41. PubMed ID: 10687702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory nerve representation of vowels in background noise.
    Sachs MB; Voigt HF; Young ED
    J Neurophysiol; 1983 Jul; 50(1):27-45. PubMed ID: 6875649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vowel Formant Frequency Discrimination in Cats: Comparison of Auditory Nerve Representations and Psychophysical Thresholds.
    May BJ; Huang A; LE Prell G; Hienz RD
    Audit Neurosci; 1996 Apr; 3(2):135-162. PubMed ID: 23599660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory efferents involved in speech-in-noise intelligibility.
    Giraud AL; Garnier S; Micheyl C; Lina G; Chays A; Chéry-Croze S
    Neuroreport; 1997 May; 8(7):1779-83. PubMed ID: 9189932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects.
    Williams EA; Brookes GB; Prasher DK
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Mar; 114(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 8203191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of Bilateral Olivocochlear Lesions on Pure-Tone Intensity Discrimination in Cats.
    May BJ; McQuone SJ
    Audit Neurosci; 1995 Jan; 1(4):385-400. PubMed ID: 23814451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Formant discrimination in noise for isolated vowels.
    Liu C; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3119-29. PubMed ID: 15603157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise.
    Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1988 Nov; 60(5):1779-98. PubMed ID: 3199181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conditioning-related protection from acoustic injury: effects of chronic deefferentation and sham surgery.
    Kujawa SG; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Dec; 78(6):3095-106. PubMed ID: 9405529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
    Purcell DW; Butler BE; Saunders TJ; Allen P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech-in-noise intelligibility does not correlate with efferent olivocochlear reflex in humans with normal hearing.
    Wagner W; Frey K; Heppelmann G; Plontke SK; Zenner HP
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jan; 128(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 17851961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vowel discrimination in cats: acquisition, effects of stimulus level, and performance in noise.
    Hienz RD; Aleszczyk CM; May BJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jun; 99(6):3656-68. PubMed ID: 8655797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise.
    Mishra SK; Lutman ME
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85756. PubMed ID: 24465686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the role of the olivocochlear bundle in hearing: 16 case studies.
    Scharf B; Magnan J; Chays A
    Hear Res; 1997 Jan; 103(1-2):101-22. PubMed ID: 9007578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.