These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Cloning and the U.S. Congress. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2002 May; 346(20):1599-602. PubMed ID: 11994549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Allow cloning in embryo research, says UK report. Loder N Nature; 1998 Dec; 396(6711):503. PubMed ID: 9859974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stem cell research. U.K. backs use of embryos, sets vote. Stone R Science; 2000 Aug; 289(5483):1269-70. PubMed ID: 10979843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stem cells--scientific, medical, and political issues. Weissman IL N Engl J Med; 2002 May; 346(20):1576-9. PubMed ID: 11994551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Should human cloning research be off limits? Kassirer JP; Rosenthal NA N Engl J Med; 1998 Mar; 338(13):905-6. PubMed ID: 9516227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Japan. Human cloning ban allows some research. Normile D Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5498):1872. PubMed ID: 11187037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Science over politics. Lanza RP; Arrow KJ; Axelrod J; Baltimore D; Benacerraf B; Bloch KE; Bloembergen N; Brown HC; Brown MS; Cibelli JB; Cohen S; Cooper LN; Corey EJ; Dulbecco R; Fischer EH; Fitch VL; Friedmen M; Friedman M; Furchgott RF; Gell-Mann M; Glaser DA; Glashow SL; Gilbert W; Goldstein JL; Wilson RW Science; 1999 Mar; 283(5409):1849-50. PubMed ID: 10206888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Embryo research. British Parliament approves new rules. Vogel G Science; 2001 Jan; 291(5501):23. PubMed ID: 11191989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cloning sparks calls for new laws. Williams N Science; 1997 Mar; 275(5305):1415. PubMed ID: 9072803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Backing for anti-cloning bill reopens embryo debate. Wadman M Nature; 1997 Aug; 388(6642):505. PubMed ID: 9252174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Human Cloning Prohibition Act: did Congress go too far? Cannon J; Haas M Harvard J Legis; 1998; 35(2):637-45. PubMed ID: 11660809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cloning and stem cells--handicapping the political and scientific debates. Daley GQ N Engl J Med; 2003 Jul; 349(3):211-2. PubMed ID: 12867604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. UK consults public on clones for research. Dickson D Nature; 1998 Feb; 391(6667):523. PubMed ID: 9468125 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientists react to government indecision. Brown P Nat Med; 1999 Aug; 5(8):855-6. PubMed ID: 10426295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Embryo research barred from federal funds. Wadman M Nature; 1996 Feb; 379(6564):386. PubMed ID: 8559232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. European perspectives on therapeutic cloning. Evers K N Engl J Med; 2002 May; 346(20):1579-82. PubMed ID: 11994550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ban cloning? Why NBAC is wrong. Wolf SM Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(5):12-5. PubMed ID: 9383659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Creating a clone in ninety days: in search of a cloning policy. Bonnicksen AL Politics Life Sci; 1997 Sep; 16(2):304-8. PubMed ID: 11902213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]