BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9508942)

  • 1. Variables which affect the marginal accuracy of the resin bonded posterior ceramic restoration: a pictorial essay.
    Liebenberg WH
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1993 Aug; 48(8):469-73. PubMed ID: 9508942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
    Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining bonded and cemented restorations: a multitechnique case study.
    Shannon A
    Dent Today; 2000 Apr; 19(4):54, 56, 58-61; quiz 61, 151. PubMed ID: 19750729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal adaptation of resin in relation to application technique and use of a dental adhesive system.
    Kocabalkan E; Dönmez F; Demirköprülü H
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1994 Sep; 2(1):424-8. PubMed ID: 9582625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A renaissance of freehand bonding.
    Feigenbaum NL
    J Gt Houst Dent Soc; 1998 Feb; 69(7):14-5, 30. PubMed ID: 9571876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentinal bonding as a desensitizing agent and composite resin provisionals.
    Davis MW
    Dent Today; 1996 Mar; 15(3):44, 46-9. PubMed ID: 9567799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal adaptation of resin-bonded light-cured glass ionomers in dentin cavities.
    Fritz UB; Finger WJ; Uno S
    Am J Dent; 1996 Dec; 9(6):253-8. PubMed ID: 9545879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Class II posterior composites--ways to reduce bond stress and microleakage by using low modulus materials.
    Moon PC
    Va Dent J; 1995; 72(2):12-4. PubMed ID: 9540749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fifth-generation bonding systems. Predictable posterior composite restorations.
    Freedman G
    Dent Today; 1996 Dec; 15(11):68, 70, 72 passim. PubMed ID: 9567886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report.
    el-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bonded indirect restorations for posterior teeth: from cavity preparation to provisionalization.
    Rocca GT; Krejci I
    Quintessence Int; 2007 May; 38(5):371-9. PubMed ID: 17568835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal gap repair with flowable resin-based composites.
    Gordan VV; Shen C; Mjor IA
    Gen Dent; 2004; 52(5):390-4. PubMed ID: 15544214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of fit and microleakage in ceramic restorations.
    Cesar PF; Braga RR; Miranda WG; Romão W
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005; 17(1):53-4. PubMed ID: 15822482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-year performance of glass-ceramic insert-resin composite restorations: clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation.
    Kiremitçi A; Bolay S; Gürgan S
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jul; 29(7):417-21. PubMed ID: 9759057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of shear bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of direct restorations in primary and permanent teeth--an in vitro study.
    da Costa CC; Oshima HM; Costa Filho LC
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(1):85-93; quiz 94-5, 111-2. PubMed ID: 18254567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of ZOE temporary restoration on resin-dentin bond strength using different adhesive strategies.
    Carvalho CN; de Oliveira Bauer JR; Loguercio AD; Reis A
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(3):144-52; discussion 153. PubMed ID: 17518904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimising the marginal adaptation of resin-bonded porcelain posterior restorations: a case report.
    Liebenberg WH
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1992 Sep; 47(9):421-3. PubMed ID: 9511625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.