These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9508942)

  • 21. Eliminating microleakage from the composite resin system.
    Estafan D; Agosta C
    Gen Dent; 2003; 51(6):506-9. PubMed ID: 15055646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations.
    Cho BH; Dickens SH; Bae JH; Chang CG; Son HH; Um CM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 12022463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Microscopic features of clinically successful dentine bonding.
    Walshaw PR; McComb D
    Dent Update; 1998 Sep; 25(7):281-6. PubMed ID: 10478022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites.
    Haller B; Hässner K; Moll K
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):574-84. PubMed ID: 14531604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tinted luting resin for partial-coverage restorations: a case report of a new provisionalization technique.
    Liebenberg WH
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Dec; 27(12):793-801. PubMed ID: 9452671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Direct composite restorations in posterior region: a case history using a nanohybrid composite.
    Manhart J
    Dent Today; 2004 Nov; 23(11):66, 68-70. PubMed ID: 15622879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bond strength of a resin-based composite to leucite-reinforced ceramic and dentin.
    Matos AB; Kuramoto M; Powers JM; Eduardo Cde P
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):113-5. PubMed ID: 10649931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sealing ability of occlusal resin composite restoration using four restorative procedures.
    Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):571-8. PubMed ID: 19049529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 1 year.
    Van Landuyt KL; Peumans M; Fieuws S; De Munck J; Cardoso MV; Ermis RB; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):847-55. PubMed ID: 18656295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Resin-bonded margins in direct posterior composites.
    Belvedere PC; Lambert DL
    Dent Today; 1997 Oct; 16(10):64, 66, 68-71. PubMed ID: 9560656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cumulative effects of successive restorative procedures on anterior crown flexure: intact versus veneered incisors.
    Magne P; Douglas WH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Jan; 31(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 11203907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A placement technique for creating ideal contours and aesthetics for adjacent multisurface posterior composites.
    Hosner JD
    Dent Today; 2005 May; 24(5):84-9; quiz 89, 65. PubMed ID: 15957636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Total bonding vs selective bonding: marginal adaptation of Class 2 composite restorations.
    Thonemann B; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Grundler W
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(5):261-71. PubMed ID: 10823072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Indirect aesthetic posterior restorations.
    Fier MA
    Dent Today; 2001 Mar; 20(3):48-53. PubMed ID: 12524867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability.
    Hannig M; Friedrichs C
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of shear and tensile bond strength between dentin and ceramics using dual-polymerizing resin cements.
    Pekkan G; Hekimoglu C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):242-52. PubMed ID: 19782827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.