These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
46. A ceramic "sandwich" technique. DeFelice R Gen Dent; 1990; 38(5):370-3. PubMed ID: 2088943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage. Opdam NJ; Feilzer AJ; Roeters JJ; Smale I Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 10388382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Marginal morphology of Class V composite restorations. Prati C; Chersoni S; Cretti L; Mongiorgi R Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):231-6. PubMed ID: 9522697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Effect of mechanical properties of resin composites on the efficacy of the dentin bonding system. Hasegawa T; Itoh K; Koike T; Yukitani W; Hisamitsu H; Wakumoto S; Fujishima A Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 10823080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer. Payne JH J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 2. Hilton TJ Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 12572649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Effect of wet and dry bonding techniques on marginal leakage. Santini A; Mitchell S Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):219-24. PubMed ID: 10388380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Influence of new light curing units and bonding agents on the microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations. Pradelle-Plasse N; Besnault C; Souad N; Colon P Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 15002957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Clinical research on bonded amalgam restorations. Part 1: SEM study of in vivo bonded amalgam restorations. Staninec M; Marshall GW; Lowe A; Ruzickova T Gen Dent; 1997; 45(4):356-60, 362. PubMed ID: 9515442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effect of light-curing method and irradiation time on marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations. Yoshikawa T; Nakaoki Y; Takada T; Burrow MF; Tagami J Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():63A-67A. PubMed ID: 14674502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]