These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9508975)

  • 1. Shear and tensile bond strengths of two resin cements to a high gold alloy: an in vitro study.
    Rosen M; Cohen J; Becker PJ
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1994 Aug; 49(8):393-6. PubMed ID: 9508975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of a new metal primer on the bond strength between a resin cement and two high-noble alloys.
    Antoniadou M; Kern M; Strub JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):554-60. PubMed ID: 11105011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of metal primers on bond strength of resin cements to base metals.
    Fonseca RG; de Almeida JG; Haneda IG; Adabo GL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 19328279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tensile strength of three resin cements following two alloy surface treatments.
    Imbery TA; Burgess JO; Naylor WP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 1520445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tensile bond strength of resin luting cement to a porcelain-fusing noble alloy.
    Stoknorm R; Isidor F; Ravnholt G
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 8957870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of two systems for bonding type II gold alloy to dentine: an in vitro study.
    Marais JT; van der Vyver PJ; Nel JC
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1996 May; 51(5):307-11. PubMed ID: 9461875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shear bond strengths of laboratory-cured prosthetic composite to primed metal surfaces.
    Watanabe I; Hotta M; Watanabe E; Atsuta M; Okabe T
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):401-3. PubMed ID: 15002955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Durability of the resin bond strength to the alumina ceramic Procera.
    Hummel M; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):498-508. PubMed ID: 15081557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New method for the in vitro evaluation of dental alloy bonding systems.
    Padrós JL; Padrós E; Keogh TP; Monterrubio M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Aug; 84(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 10946342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro bonding of adhesive resin to dental alloys and dentine.
    van der Vyver PJ; de Wet FA
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1996 Jul; 51(7):419-25. PubMed ID: 9462023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of surface treatments on the shear bond strength of Panavia 21 to a Type III gold alloy.
    Aziz AA; Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Gill DS; Moles DR
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Jun; 14(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 16808108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of surface treatments on shear bond strengths between a resin cement and an alumina core.
    Madani M; Chu FC; McDonald AV; Smales RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jun; 83(6):644-7. PubMed ID: 10842131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength.
    Schmage P; Sohn J; Ozcan M; Nergiz I
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 16039707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: Part 1. Comparison of shear bond strengths between different metal-resin bonding systems and a metal-ceramic system.
    Petridis H; Garefis P; Hirayama H; Kafantaris NM; Koidis PT
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):635-9. PubMed ID: 14714844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bonding of adhesive resin luting agents to metal and amalgam.
    Osman SA; McCabe JF; Walls AW
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Dec; 16(4):171-6. PubMed ID: 19177728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro evaluation of long-term bonding of Procera AllCeram alumina restorations with a modified resin luting agent.
    Blatz MB; Sadan A; Arch GH; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 12690351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: part 2. Effect of alloy surface treatment on elemental composition of alloy and bond strength.
    Petridis H; Garefis P; Hirayama H; Kafantaris NM; Koidis PT
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 15008237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of tensile bond strengths of resin-retained prostheses made using five alloys.
    Rubo JH; Pegoraro LF; Ferreira PM
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 8957864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shear bond strength of Rexillium III to enamel using resin composite cements.
    Knobloch LA; Kerby RE; Brantley WA; Laurell KA
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(6):555-62. PubMed ID: 9171494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.