146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9509777)
1. Comparison of resorbable and nonresorbable guided bone regeneration materials: a preliminary study.
McGinnis M; Larsen P; Miloro M; Beck FM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 9509777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy of high-density versus semipermeable PTFE membranes in an elderly experimental model.
Marouf HA; El-Guindi HM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Feb; 89(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 10673651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Guided tissue regeneration around dental implants in immediate extraction sockets: comparison of resorbable and nonresorbable membranes].
Mao C; Sato J; Matsuura M; Seto K
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1997 Dec; 19(6):436-41. PubMed ID: 10453535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of barrier membranes as graft protectors in the treatment of localized bone defects. An experimental study in a canine model.
Stavropoulos F; Dahlin C; Ruskin JD; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 15248878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of guided bone regeneration using absorbable and permanent barrier membranes: a histologic report.
Wiltfang J; Merten HA; Peters JH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 9638014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A feasibility study evaluating an in situ formed synthetic biodegradable membrane for guided bone regeneration in dogs.
Jung RE; Lecloux G; Rompen E; Ramel CF; Buser D; Hammerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 19191792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration.
Zitzmann NU; Naef R; Schärer P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):844-52. PubMed ID: 9425767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Guided periodontal regeneration using bilayered collagen membranes and bovine bone mineral in fenestration defects in the canine.
Tal H; Artzi Z; Moses O; Nemcovsky C; Kozlovsky A
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Oct; 25(5):509-18. PubMed ID: 16250573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Immunohistochemical characterization of guided bone regeneration at a dehiscence-type defect using different barrier membranes: an experimental study in dogs.
Schwarz F; Rothamel D; Herten M; Wüstefeld M; Sager M; Ferrari D; Becker J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Apr; 19(4):402-15. PubMed ID: 18324961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tissue regeneration in bone defects adjacent to endosseous implants: an experimental pilot study.
De Vicente JC; López-Arranz E; López-Arranz JS
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Feb; 20(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 11203547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Osseointegration of titanium implants following guided bone regeneration using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and various bone fillers.
Fiorellini JP; Kim DM; Nakajima Y; Weber HP
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Jun; 27(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 17694952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Guided tissue regeneration around dental implants in immediate extraction sockets: comparison of resorbable and nonresorbable membranes.
Mao C; Sato J; Matsuura M; Seto K
Chin Med Sci J; 1997 Sep; 12(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 11360628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a bioabsorbable physical barrier for guided bone regeneration. Part I. Material alone.
Mellonig JT; Nevins M; Sanchez R
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1998 Apr; 18(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 9663091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Guided bone regeneration with the combined use of resorbable membranes and autogenous drilling dust or xenografts for the treatment of dehiscence-type defects around implants: an experimental study in dogs.
Lee SH; Yoon HJ; Park MK; Kim YS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1089-94. PubMed ID: 19216278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regeneration of standardized mandibular bone defects using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and various bone fillers.
Nakajima Y; Fiorellini JP; Kim DM; Weber HP
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Apr; 27(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 17514887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of acellular bovine pericardium material with collagen membrane in guiding bone regeneration].
Wu H; Hu G
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jul; 21(7):743-7. PubMed ID: 17694668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vivosorb, Bio-Gide, and Gore-Tex as barrier membranes in rat mandibular defects: an evaluation by microradiography and micro-CT.
Gielkens PF; Schortinghuis J; de Jong JR; Raghoebar GM; Stegenga B; Bos RR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 May; 19(5):516-21. PubMed ID: 18416728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhancement of bone ingrowth into collagen/HA composite implants using e-PTFE membranes.
Marouf HA; al-Khateeb TL; Cataldo E
J Ir Dent Assoc; 1999; 45(2):52-7. PubMed ID: 10686923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment of peri-implant defects with guided bone regeneration: a comparative clinical study with various membranes and bone grafts.
Lorenzoni M; Pertl C; Keil C; Wegscheider WA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 9796147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a bioabsorbable physical barrier for guided bone regeneration. Part II. Material and a bone replacement graft.
Mellonig JT; Nevins M; Sanchez R
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1998 Apr; 18(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 9663092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
