BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9509778)

  • 1. Three-dimensional force measurements with mandibular overdentures connected to implants by ball-shaped retentive anchors. A clinical study.
    Mericske-Stern R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 9509778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Force distribution on implants supporting overdentures: the effect of distal bar extensions. A 3-D in vivo study.
    Mericske-Stern R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Apr; 8(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 9758965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vivo force measurements on maxillary implants supporting a fixed prosthesis or an overdenture: a pilot study.
    Mericske-Stern R; Venetz E; Fahrländer F; Bürgin W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):535-47. PubMed ID: 11105009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional force measurements on mandibular implants supporting overdentures.
    Mericske-Stern R; Geering AH; Burgin WB; Graf H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 1398835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 3-D in vivo force measurements on mandibular implants supporting overdentures. A comparative study.
    Mericske-Stern R; Piotti M; Sirtes G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Dec; 7(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 9151607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
    Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of different attachment systems with implant-retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG.
    Uçankale M; Akoğlu B; Ozkan Y; Ozkan YK
    Gerodontology; 2012 Mar; 29(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 20604812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
    Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of implants on maximum bite force in edentulous patients.
    Rismanchian M; Bajoghli F; Mostajeran Z; Fazel A; Eshkevari Ps
    J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 19813425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A longitudinal study on mandibular implants supporting an overdenture: the influence of retention mechanism and anatomic-prosthetic variables on periimplant parameters.
    Oetterli M; Kiener P; Mericske-Stern R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):536-42. PubMed ID: 12066700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
    Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human ex vivo bone tissue strains around immediately loaded implants supporting maxillary overdentures.
    Akça K; Akkocaoğlu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec; 16(6):715-22. PubMed ID: 16307579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo measurements of maximal occlusal force and minimal pressure threshold on overdentures supported by implants or natural roots: a comparative study, Part 1.
    Mericske-Stern R; Hofmann J; Wedig A; Geering AH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(6):641-9. PubMed ID: 8181826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers.
    Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study.
    Maeda Y; Horisaka M; Yagi K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18081872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maintenance requirements associated with mandibular implant overdentures: clinical results after first year of service.
    Bilhan H; Geckili O; Mumcu E; Bilmenoglu C
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Dec; 37(6):697-704. PubMed ID: 20932124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.