These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9509778)

  • 21. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments.
    Gulizio MP; Agar JR; Kelly JR; Taylor TD
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15733129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces.
    Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T; Kotecha S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1315-9. PubMed ID: 21426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of denture stability on bite force and muscular effort.
    Caloss R; Al-Arab M; Finn RA; Throckmorton GS
    J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Jun; 38(6):434-9. PubMed ID: 21050259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
    MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The incomprehensible success of the implant stabilised overdenture in the edentulous mandible: a literature review on transfer of chewing forces to bone surrounding implants.
    Chao YL; Meijer HJ; Van Oort RP; Versteegh PA
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Dec; 3(6):255-61. PubMed ID: 8603169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of detachment forces of two implant overdenture attachment types: effect of detachment speed.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW; Damrow MP; Galbraith CT
    Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 18795521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
    Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of the attachment type and implant number supporting mandibular overdentures on stress distribution: an in vitro study, part I.
    Arat Bilhan S; Bilhan H; Bozdag E; Sunbuloglu E; Baykasoglu C; Kutay O
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 23296030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Masticatory function with mandibular implant-supported overdentures fitted with different attachment types.
    van der Bilt A; van Kampen FM; Cune MS
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 Jun; 114(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 16776767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems.
    Menicucci G; Lorenzetti M; Pera P; Preti G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 9638007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. On occlusal forces in dentitions with implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses.
    Falk H
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 69():1-40. PubMed ID: 2196708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of superstructure type and design on force transmission via implant-stabilised mandibular prostheses.
    el-Sheikh AM; Hobkirk JA; Kelleway JP
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1999; 7(2):45-50. PubMed ID: 10865379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The measurement of retentive forces in mandibular complete overdenture with Magfit magnetic attachments].
    Du L; Xu C; Chao Y
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Oct; 21(5):366-8. PubMed ID: 14650991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
    Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Patient satisfaction with different types of implant-retained overdentures in the edentate mandible].
    Cune MS; van Kampen FM; van der Bilt A
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2006 Oct; 113(10):401-7. PubMed ID: 17058761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Control of jaw closing forces: a comparison between implant-stabilised overdenture wearers and complete denture wearers.
    Leung T; Haag BM
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2000 Dec; 8(4):145-8. PubMed ID: 11692997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.