These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9509784)
1. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Stegaroiu R; Sato T; Kusakari H; Miyakawa O Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 9509784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of splinted prosthesis supported a wide implant or two implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Huang HL; Huang JS; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chang CH; Chen MY Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 16117772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Degerliyurt K; Simsek B; Erkmen E; Eser A Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e1-11. PubMed ID: 20598590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses. Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finite element analysis of 2 immediate loading systems in edentulous mandible: rigid and semirigid splinting of implants. Teixeira MF; Ramalho SA; de Mattias Sartori IA; Lehmann RB Implant Dent; 2010 Feb; 19(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20147815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite element stress analysis of edentulous mandibles with different bone types supporting multiple-implant superstructures. de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Freitas MM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1108-14. PubMed ID: 21197486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone stress analysis of various angulations of mesiodistal implants with splinted crowns in the posterior mandible: a three-dimensional finite element study. Lan TH; Pan CY; Lee HE; Huang HL; Wang CH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):763-70. PubMed ID: 20657872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants. Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants. Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis. Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical effects of implant-tooth rigid connection by a fixed partial denture: a 3d finite element analysis. Naveau A; Pierrisnard L Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2009 Sep; 17(3):98-104. PubMed ID: 19839184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures. Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-dimensional finite element analysis of the influence of bridge design on stress distribution in bone tissues surrounding fixtures of osseointegrated implants in the lower molar region. Arataki T; Adachi Y; Kishi M Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1998 Aug; 39(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 9927906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment planning of implants when 3 mandibular posterior teeth are missing: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Chen XY; Zhang CY; Nie EM; Zhang MC Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):340-3. PubMed ID: 22814561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone. Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A three-dimensional finite element study on two versus four implants in an edentulous mandible. Meijer HJ; Starmans FJ; Steen WH; Bosman F Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 7916894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown. Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible incorporating six osseointegrated implants for stress analysis of mandibular cantilever prostheses. van Zyl PP; Grundling NL; Jooste CH; Terblanche E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 7615317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]