These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9511415)

  • 1. [The marginal permeability of fillings made from different filling materials in the early periods of treatment].
    Elistratova M; Tarmaeva S
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1998; 77(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 9511415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
    Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on Class II composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Liu JK; Chang CH; Shieh DB
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 15195731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.
    Li Q; Jepsen S; Albers HK; Eberhard J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 16084584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Marginal adaptation of different esthetic filling materials under the effect of heat treatment].
    Köhalmi T; Gorzó I; Rácz B; Mari A; Boda K; Mihalik E
    Fogorv Sz; 1999 Oct; 92(10):301-5. PubMed ID: 10575817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strengths of composite materials in comparison to their polymerization shrinkage.
    Ilie N; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jul; 22(7):593-601. PubMed ID: 16289723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [In vitro comparison of marginal adaptation of various filling materials. I. Effect of the filling material on marginal adaptation].
    Kóhalmi T; Gorzo I; Mari A; Nagy K
    Fogorv Sz; 1999 Mar; 92(3):87-95. PubMed ID: 10205985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Managing stress with composite resin, Part 1: The restorative-tooth interface.
    Terry DA; Leinfelder KF
    Dent Today; 2006 Dec; 25(12):98, 100-4; quiz 104. PubMed ID: 17193798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of light-curing method and irradiation time on marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations.
    Yoshikawa T; Nakaoki Y; Takada T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():63A-67A. PubMed ID: 14674502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 30-Month randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a nanofill and a nanohybrid composite.
    de Andrade AK; Duarte RM; Medeiros e Silva FD; Batista AU; Lima KC; Pontual ML; Montes MA
    J Dent; 2011 Jan; 39(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 20888884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the effect of an internal light conductor on the marginal integrity of class-II composite fillings.
    Stoll R; Gente M; Palichleb M; Stachniss V
    Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 16519928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-and-a-half-year clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin in children.
    Memarpour M; Mesbahi M; Shafıei F
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2010; 77(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 20819404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association of photoactivation methods and low modulus liners on marginal adaptation of composite restorations.
    Alonso RC; Cunha LG; Correr GM; De Goes MF; Correr-Sobrinho L; Puppin-Rontani RM; Sinhoreti MA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Dec; 62(6):298-304. PubMed ID: 15848972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Liu JK; Chao CC; Liao FP; Chen YH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 11208208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct posterior resin composite restorations: considerations on finishing/polishing. Clinical procedures.
    Ferreira Rde S; Lopes GC; Baratieri LN
    Quintessence Int; 2004 May; 35(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 15130074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.