130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9511485)
1. The relationship between facial 3-D morphometry and the perception of attractiveness in children.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Poggio CE; Colombo A; Tartaglia G
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 9511485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Soft tissue facial morphology related to headform: a three-dimensional quantitative analysis in childhood.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Poggio CE; Schmitz JH; Colombo A
J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1997; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 9224943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of soft tissue facial morphometry in children with Class I and Class II occlusions.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Serrao G; Puletto S; Bignotto M; Tartaglia G
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 7814923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of averageness and sexual dimorphism on the judgment of facial attractiveness.
Komori M; Kawamura S; Ishihara S
Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(8):862-9. PubMed ID: 19285521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Craniofacial growth: a three-dimensional soft-tissue study from 6 years to adulthood.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Poggio CE; Schmitz JH
J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1998; 18(3):138-49. PubMed ID: 9785218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Facial attractiveness: a longitudinal study.
Tatarunaite E; Playle R; Hood K; Shaw W; Richmond S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):676-82; quiz 755. PubMed ID: 15953892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ranking facial attractiveness.
Knight H; Keith O
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 16043472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Divine proportions in attractive and nonattractive faces.
Pancherz H; Knapp V; Erbe C; Heiss AM
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 20209174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Skeletofacial morphology of attractive and nonattractive faces.
Matoula S; Pancherz H
Angle Orthod; 2006 Mar; 76(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 16539543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Photographic soft-tissue profile analysis in children at 6 years of age.
Dimaggio FR; Ciusa V; Sforza C; Ferrario VF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 17920500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Facial esthetics in adolescents and its relationship to "ideal" ratios and angles.
Kiekens RM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; van 't Hof MA; van 't Hof BE; Straatman H; Maltha JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):188.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18249280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-dimensional vs three-dimensional assessment of soft tissue facial profile: a non invasive study in 6-year-old healthy children.
Sforza C; Dimaggio FR; Dellavia C; Grandi G; Ferrario VF
Minerva Stomatol; 2007 May; 56(5):253-65. PubMed ID: 17529913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional facial morphometry of attractive children and normal children in the deciduous and early mixed dentition.
Sforza C; Laino A; D'Alessio R; Dellavia C; Grandi G; Ferrario VF
Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):1025-33. PubMed ID: 18004919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics.
Spyropoulos MN; Halazonetis DJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 11343017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of type of facial stimuli.
Rennels JL; Bronstad PM; Langlois JH
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):884-93. PubMed ID: 18665733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A three-dimensional study of sexual dimorphism in the human face.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Poggio CE; Serrao G; Miani A
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 7751762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Facial attractiveness: visual impact of symmetry increases significantly towards the midline.
Springer IN; Wannicke B; Warnke PH; Zernial O; Wiltfang J; Russo PA; Terheyden H; Reinhardt A; Wolfart S
Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Aug; 59(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 17667409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
