These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9511535)

  • 1. Perceptions of facial appearance by orthodontists and the general public.
    Cochrane SM; Cunningham SJ; Hunt NP
    J Clin Orthod; 1997 Mar; 31(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 9511535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptions of laypersons and orthodontists regarding the buccal corridor in long- and short-face individuals.
    Zange SE; Ramos AL; Cuoghi OA; de Mendonça MR; Suguino R
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan; 81(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 20936959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of the gingival display on posed smile with different facial forms: a comparison of dentists and patients concepts.
    Akhare PJ; Daga A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 23422598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial profile preferences of black women before and after orthodontic treatment.
    McKoy-White J; Evans CA; Viana G; Anderson NK; Giddon DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jan; 129(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 16443473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered maxillary incisor crowding.
    Ma W; Preston B; Asai Y; Guan H; Guan G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):579-86. PubMed ID: 25439208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. . Facial attractiveness: ranking of end-of-treatment facial photographs by pairs of Chinese and US orthodontists.
    Xu TM; Korn EL; Liu Y; Oh HS; Lee KH; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 18617106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists.
    Yin L; Jiang M; Chen W; Smales RJ; Wang Q; Tang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):750-6. PubMed ID: 24880845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings.
    Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson MR
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Oct; 21(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 10565092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preferences of AP position of the straight Caucasian facial profile.
    Mees S; Jiménez Bellinga R; Mommaerts MY; De Pauw GA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 41(8):755-63. PubMed ID: 23453133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Professional assessment of facial profile attractiveness.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 16102405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the influence of lower facial profile convexity on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 22883980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orthodontists' perceptions of the need for orthognathic surgery in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion based on extraoral examinations.
    Hodge TM; Boyd PT; Munyombwe T; Littlewood SJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 22748990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of a brown subject displaying different degrees of lip projection or retrusion, in the city of Salvador/Bahia.
    Carneiro EN; Pithon MM; Machado AW; Braga E
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(2):62-67. PubMed ID: 29898159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The ability of orthodontists and laypeople to discriminate mandibular stepwise advancements in a Class II retrognathic mandible.
    Barroso MC; Silva NC; Quintão CC; Normando D
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 23021117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imprecision in orthodontic diagnosis: reliability of clinical measures of malocclusion.
    Keeling SD; McGorray S; Wheeler TT; King GJ
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(5):381-91. PubMed ID: 8893108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment: perceptions of patients, parents, orthodontists, and general dentists.
    Maxfield BJ; Hamdan AM; Tüfekçi E; Shroff B; Best AM; Lindauer SJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Mar; 141(3):337-344. PubMed ID: 22381494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association between ratings of facial attractivess and patients' motivation for orthognathic surgery.
    Vargo JK; Gladwin M; Ngan P
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2003 Feb; 6(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 12627797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A different look: 3-dimensional facial imaging of a child with Binder syndrome.
    Kau CH; Hunter LM; Hingston EJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):704-9. PubMed ID: 18005847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.