These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9511601)

  • 21. A 3-year longitudinal, controlled clinical study of a gallium-based restorative material.
    Dunne SM; Abraham R; Pankhurst CL
    Br Dent J; 2005 Mar; 198(6):355-9; discussion 348. PubMed ID: 15789103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite in class V carious lesions: 3-year results.
    Demirci M; Ersev H; Topçubaşi M; Uçok M
    Dent Mater J; 2005 Sep; 24(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 16279721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions.
    Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Gregory PN; Owens BM
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 10649933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN; Machado A; Van Noort R; Ritter AV; Baratieri NM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The tooth-amalgam joint: the role of the marginal bevel].
    Colin L; Auther A; Maurette A
    Chir Dent Fr; 1989 Mar; 59(462):39-44. PubMed ID: 2598698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams.
    Mair LH
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):483-90. PubMed ID: 9807127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in Class II restorations of primary teeth: a two-year follow-up study.
    Papagiannoulis L; Kakaboura A; Pantaleon F; Kavvadia K
    Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 10436476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Alloy particle shape and sensitivity of high-copper amalgams to manipulative variables.
    Brown IH; Miller DR
    Am J Dent; 1993 Oct; 6(5):248-54. PubMed ID: 7880469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Marginal integrity of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Tarim B; Suzuki S; Suzuki S; Cox CF
    Am J Dent; 1996 Apr; 9(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 9522690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. One-year clinical evaluation of two composite materials used for anterior class V restorations.
    Sakrana AA; Tanoue N; Kawasaki K; Matsumura H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Oct; 31(10):985-90. PubMed ID: 15387839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. One-year comparison of metallic and translucent matrices in Class II composite resin restorations.
    Cenci MS; Demarco FF; Pereira CL; Lund RG; de Carvalho RM
    Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 17380807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years.
    Smales RJ; Wetherell JD
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth.
    Gianordoli Neto R; Santiago SL; Mendonça JS; Passos VF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):26-33. PubMed ID: 18473024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bond strengths of the adhesive resin-amalgam interface.
    Ruzicková T; Staninec M; Marshall GW; Hutton JE
    Am J Dent; 1997 Aug; 10(4):192-4. PubMed ID: 9590907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15195725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.