These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9511625)
21. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging. Manhart J; Schmidt M; Chen HY; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):357-66. PubMed ID: 11504435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Variables which affect the marginal accuracy of the resin bonded posterior ceramic restoration: a pictorial essay. Liebenberg WH J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1993 Aug; 48(8):469-73. PubMed ID: 9508942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations. Ferrari M; Mason PN; Fabianelli A; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):134-42. PubMed ID: 10649936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical performance and marginal adaptation of class II direct and semidirect composite restorations over 3.5 years in vivo. Spreafico RC; Krejci I; Dietschi D J Dent; 2005 Jul; 33(6):499-507. PubMed ID: 15935270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Esthetic posterior restorations utilizing the double-inlay technique: a novel approach in esthetic dentistry. Hannig M; Schmeiser R Quintessence Int; 1997 Feb; 28(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 10332359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The use of resin-based composite in children. Donly KJ; García-Godoy F Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):480-8. PubMed ID: 12412963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mastering the art of indirect composite restorations, Part 2. Pitel ML Dent Today; 1996 Mar; 15(3):50, 52, 54-7. PubMed ID: 9567800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Preparation design and considerations for direct posterior composite inlay/onlay restoration. Fligor J Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Aug; 20(7):413-9; quiz 420, 432. PubMed ID: 18807449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of fit and microleakage in ceramic restorations. Cesar PF; Braga RR; Miranda WG; Romão W Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005; 17(1):53-4. PubMed ID: 15822482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites. Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Class II posterior composites--ways to reduce bond stress and microleakage by using low modulus materials. Moon PC Va Dent J; 1995; 72(2):12-4. PubMed ID: 9540749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface. Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. Dejak B; Mlotkowski A J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In vitro microleakage of CAD/CAM restorations cemented with a microfilled composite cement. Hembree JH; Puckett A; Hines R Miss Dent Assoc J; 1997; 53(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 9573781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]