These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 951172)

  • 1. Influence of selection difficulty on the time required for icon formation.
    Solman RT
    Perception; 1976; 5(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 951172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of similarity between target and irrelevant items on visual information processing.
    Solman RT
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Aug; 41(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 1178431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is construction reserved for the target during visual search?
    Solman RT
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Feb; 40(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 1118290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of constant target sets in visual search tasks.
    Holmes DL; Olsho LW; Peper R; Schulte A; Green P
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Dec; 47(3 Pt 1):803-8. PubMed ID: 740473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of target separation on selective attention.
    Solman RT
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Dec; 41(3):755-60. PubMed ID: 1215116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interactions between memory scanning and visual scanning in display monitoring.
    Liu Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Aug; 39(8):1038-53. PubMed ID: 8681930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task difficulty and visual similarity increase a distractor's effects on random shapes.
    Hines D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Feb; 46(1):235-48. PubMed ID: 643480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Icon identification in context: the changing role of icon characteristics with user experience.
    Isherwood SJ; McDougall SJ; Curry MB
    Hum Factors; 2007 Jun; 49(3):465-76. PubMed ID: 17552310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of stimulus probability and visual similarity on stimulus encoding.
    Irwin DE; Pachella RG
    Am J Psychol; 1985; 98(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 4003618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual search performance on an lcd monitor: effects of color combination of figure and icon background, shape of icon, and line width of icon border.
    Huang KC; Chiu TL
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Apr; 104(2):562-74. PubMed ID: 17566446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the selection and evaluation of visual display symbology: factors influencing search and identification times.
    Remington R; Williams D
    Hum Factors; 1986 Aug; 28(4):407-20. PubMed ID: 3793109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kanizsa subjective figures capture visual spatial attention: evidence from electrophysiological and behavioral data.
    Senkowski D; Röttger S; Grimm S; Foxe JJ; Herrmann CS
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):872-86. PubMed ID: 15716159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of schizophrenics and normals on a visual search task.
    Russell PN; Page AE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Apr; 42(2):399-402. PubMed ID: 1272685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The apparent and effective dimensionality of representations of objects.
    Spence I
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):738-47. PubMed ID: 15709334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Icon flickering, flicker rate, and color combinations of an icon's symbol/background in visual search performance.
    Huang KC; Chiang SY; Chen CF
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Feb; 106(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 18459362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of density of noise field and delay on information-processing of patterned inputs.
    Levine DM; Mayzner MS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Jun; 42(3):819-24. PubMed ID: 1272731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incidental learning of probability information is differentially affected by the type of visual working memory representation.
    van Lamsweerde AE; Beck MR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Dec; 69(4):283-96. PubMed ID: 26010021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Target uncertainty and visual scanning strategies.
    Megaw ED; Richardson J
    Hum Factors; 1979 Jun; 21(3):303-15. PubMed ID: 511183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of artificial scotomas on eye movements during visual search.
    Cornelissen FW; Bruin KJ; Kooijman AC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 15630401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Verbal asymmetries and levels of processing in an interactive dual-task paradigm.
    Adams BJ; Duda PD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Apr; 60(2):371-83. PubMed ID: 4000849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.