These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9513107)

  • 1. Comparison of the new matrix system with traditional fixed prosthodontic impression procedures.
    Livaditis GJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 9513107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The matrix impression system for fixed prosthodontics.
    Livaditis GJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 9513108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The laminar impression technique.
    Schoenrock GA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Oct; 62(4):392-5. PubMed ID: 2685238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques.
    Baba NZ; Goodacre CJ; Jekki R; Won J
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jan; 58(1):45-68. PubMed ID: 24286645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impression material selection in contemporary fixed prosthodontics: technique, rationale, and indications.
    Lee EA
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2005 Nov; 26(11):780, 782-4, 786-9. PubMed ID: 16300232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The global impression technic in fixed dentures].
    Lamy M; Mainjot A
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2001; 56(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 16193850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An alternative method for direct custom tray construction using a visible light-cured resin.
    Castellani D; Basile M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Jul; 78(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 9237149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictable fixed prosthodontics: technique is the key to success.
    Lowe RA
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Mar; 23(3 Suppl 1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11913316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of one-step vs. two-step impression techniques on long-term accuracy and dimensional stability when the finish line is within the gingival sulcular area.
    Levartovsky S; Zalis M; Pilo R; Harel N; Ganor Y; Brosh T
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 23734561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct custom implant impression copings for the preservation of the pontic receptor site architecture.
    Schoenbaum TR; Han TJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Mar; 107(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 22489334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality.
    Acar Ö; Erkut S; Özçelik TB; Ozdemır E; Akçil M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 24360008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of elastomeric impression materials used in fixed prosthodontics.
    Ciesco JN; Malone WF; Sandrik JL; Mazur B
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Jan; 45(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 7007629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
    Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraoral registration coping formation using an interim restoration as a matrix.
    Stamoulis K
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Jul; 19(5):406-8. PubMed ID: 20497303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.
    Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental study on the use of spacer foils in two-step putty and wash impression procedures using silicone impression materials.
    Mann K; Davids A; Range U; Richter G; Boening K; Reitemeier B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 25453563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simplifying and improving soft-tissue management for fixed-prosthodontic impressions.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Feb; 144(2):198-200. PubMed ID: 23372137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Have fixed-prosthodontic impressions become easier?
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Aug; 134(8):1121-3. PubMed ID: 12956356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quick technique for provisional bridge fabrication.
    Gleghorn T
    Dent Today; 2001 Oct; 20(10):56-9. PubMed ID: 11665418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A procedure for making fixed prosthodontic impressions with the use of preformed crown shells.
    Dimashkieh MR; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jan; 73(1):95-6. PubMed ID: 7699606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.