These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9513107)

  • 21. [Complete impressions with thiokol elastomers using customized chambered impression trays in fixed dentures].
    Dumont A
    J Dent Que; 1984 Jan; 21():47-53. PubMed ID: 6379005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interocclusal wax impressions for use in provisional and associated fixed prosthodontic procedures.
    Hoffman JM; Rubin MK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Oct; 62(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 2685239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Current data on thermoformed trays in fixed prosthetics].
    Barety J; Chouteau PJ; Laurent M
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1982; 36(139):361-73. PubMed ID: 6760687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials in custom-made and stock trays.
    Valderhaug J; Fløystrand F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Oct; 52(4):514-7. PubMed ID: 6389833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impression technique for ovate pontics.
    de Vasconcellos DK; Volpato CÂ; Zani IM; Bottino MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jan; 105(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 21194589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Replication by silicone impression materials in crown and bridge construction.
    Hoffman JM
    N Y State Dent J; 1987 Jan; 53(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 3540758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Exposure of subgingival margins by nonsurgical gingival displacement.
    Reiman MB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1976 Dec; 36(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 792433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials in the Management of Gingival Sulcus Width: A Comparative Study.
    Rathod A; Jacob SS; MAlqahtani A; Valsan I; Majeed R; Premnath A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):703-706. PubMed ID: 34393130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Gordon GE; Johnson GH; Drennon DG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2404101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Incidence of impression material found in the gingival sulcus after impression procedure for fixed partial dentures.
    Marshak BL; Cardash HS; Ben-Ur Z
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Mar; 57(3):306-8. PubMed ID: 3553551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The accuracy of dual-arch impressions: a pilot study.
    Larson TD; Nielsen MA; Brackett WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):625-7. PubMed ID: 12131884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
    Leong EW; Cheng AC; Khin NT; Lee H; Leong DJ
    Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of different gingival retraction cords.
    Kumbuloglu O; User A; Toksavul S; Boyacioglu H
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Feb; 38(2):e92-8. PubMed ID: 17510720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relationship of the periodontium to impression procedures.
    Kois JC; Vakay RT
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Aug; 21(8):684-6, 688, 690 passim. PubMed ID: 11199659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Clinical comparison of methods of gingival retraction in cemented prosthetics].
    Touati B; Dahancohen R
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1983 Mar; (141):17-54. PubMed ID: 6349282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Making a custom tray for elastomeric impression materials without a primary cast.
    Ansari IH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Nov; 72(5):569-71. PubMed ID: 7844762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quality of impressions after use of the Magic FoamCord gingival retraction system--a clinical study of 269 abutment teeth.
    Beier US; Kranewitter R; Dumfahrt H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 19418859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Indications and advantages of gingival flange in fixed prosthetics. A new technique].
    Geoffrion J; Diaz L; Loume P
    Inf Dent; 1990 Nov; 72(38):3599-605. PubMed ID: 2258229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Indirect provisionalization.
    Anglis L
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1999; 78(3):34-5. PubMed ID: 11992944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.