These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9513108)

  • 1. The matrix impression system for fixed prosthodontics.
    Livaditis GJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 9513108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the new matrix system with traditional fixed prosthodontic impression procedures.
    Livaditis GJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 9513107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Final impressions: a review of material properties and description of a current technique.
    Perakis N; Belser UC; Magne P
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Apr; 24(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 15119881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The laminar impression technique.
    Schoenrock GA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Oct; 62(4):392-5. PubMed ID: 2685238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping.
    Linkevicius T; Svediene O; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A modified putty-wash vinyl polysiloxane impression technique for fixed prosthodontics.
    Chaimattayompol N; Park D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Dec; 98(6):483-5. PubMed ID: 18061743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.
    Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vinyl polysiloxane impression material in removable prosthodontics. Part 1: edentulous impressions.
    Massad JJ; Cagna DR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Aug; 28(8):452-9; quiz 460, 470. PubMed ID: 18578103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vinyl polysiloxane impression material in removable prosthodontics. Part 2: Immediate denture and reline impressions.
    Cagna DR; Massad JJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Sep; 28(9):519-26; quiz 527-8. PubMed ID: 17907375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impression materials in fixed prosthodontics: influence of choice on clinical procedure.
    Hamalian TA; Nasr E; Chidiac JJ
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Feb; 20(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 21284760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct custom implant impression copings for the preservation of the pontic receptor site architecture.
    Schoenbaum TR; Han TJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Mar; 107(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 22489334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Custom impression trays. Part II: Removal forces.
    Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Moseley JP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Mar; 71(3):316-8. PubMed ID: 8164177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of one-step vs. two-step impression techniques on long-term accuracy and dimensional stability when the finish line is within the gingival sulcular area.
    Levartovsky S; Zalis M; Pilo R; Harel N; Ganor Y; Brosh T
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 23734561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vinyl polysiloxane impression material in removable prosthodontics part 3: implant and external impressions.
    Massad JJ; Cagna DR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Oct; 28(10):554-60; quiz 561. PubMed ID: 18018390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vivo investigation of seating and removal forces associated with recording impressions in dentate patients.
    Sotiriou M; Hobkirk JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):455-62. PubMed ID: 8809249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An alternative putty/wash impression technique.
    Bassi GS
    Dent Update; 2000 Oct; 27(8):376-8. PubMed ID: 11218529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A complete denture impression technique survey of postdoctoral prosthodontic programs in the United States.
    Mehra M; Vahidi F; Berg RW
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 24118134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental study on the use of spacer foils in two-step putty and wash impression procedures using silicone impression materials.
    Mann K; Davids A; Range U; Richter G; Boening K; Reitemeier B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 25453563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques.
    Donovan TE; Chee WW
    Dent Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 48(2):vi-vii, 445-70. PubMed ID: 15172610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.